Does land titling improve credit access? Quasi-experimental evidence from rural China

被引:25
|
作者
Zhang, Longyao [1 ]
Cheng, Wenli [2 ]
Cheng, Enjiang [3 ]
Wu, Bi [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Finance, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Monash Univ, Monash Business Sch, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Victoria Univ, Victoria Inst Strateg Econ Studies, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Res Ctr Rural Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Rural land titling; access to credit; channels of the credit effects; quasi-experiment; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY; TENURE SECURITY; REGISTRATION; INVESTMENT; IMPACT; INSTITUTIONS; CONSTRAINTS; MARKETS;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2019.1644446
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Based on official surveys conducted in 2010 and 2015, we study how the Chinese land titling reform beginning in 2009 affected rural households' access to credit. We find that the reform had differential credit effects across households. For households with above-average economic status (measured by the area of cultivated land, level of income, and convenience of bank visits), access to formal credit improved as a result of the reform. For households with below-average economics status, reliance on informal credit lessened. We show that the availability of land as collateral might have enhanced access to formal credit. Another channel of the credit effects was income and wealth. We find that land titling had a positive impact on average household income, which would reduce their need for informal credit. For those households with above-average area of cultivated land, land titling increased their wealth and might have expanded their operations, which would increase both their credit demand and their ability to access formal credit.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 241
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How does land titling affect credit demand, supply, access, and rationing: Evidence from China
    Cheng, Wenli
    Zhou, Nan
    Zhang, Longyao
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 2021, 69 (03): : 383 - 414
  • [2] Does innovative city pilot policy improve carbon reduction? Quasi-experimental evidence from China
    Fan, Mengmeng
    Zhang, Zhenhua
    Wei, Yigang
    Sun, Shuo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 262
  • [3] Does environmental management system reform improve air quality? Quasi-experimental evidence from China
    Chi, Guodong
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    Fang, Hong
    [J]. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2024, 81 : 45 - 62
  • [4] Does education improve financial behaviors? Quasi-experimental evidence from Britain
    Gray, Daniel
    Montagnoli, Alberto
    Moro, Mirko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2021, 183 : 481 - 507
  • [5] Land titling, land reallocation experience, and investment incentives: Evidence from rural China
    Hong, Weijie
    Luo, Biliang
    Hu, Xinyan
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 90
  • [6] Property Rights and Water Access: Evidence from Land Titling in Rural Peru
    Meeks, Robyn
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 102 : 345 - 357
  • [7] The Impact of Microcredit on Child Education: Quasi-experimental Evidence from Rural China
    You, Jing
    Annim, Samuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2014, 50 (07): : 926 - 948
  • [8] Does limited decentralization of environmental enforcement power improve air quality? Quasi-experimental evidence from China
    Tang, Yu
    Mao, Yijie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 412
  • [9] Does the land titling program promote rural housing land transfer in China? Evidence from household surveys in Hubei Province
    Song, Mingjie
    Wu, Yuling
    Chen, Lu
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 97
  • [10] Land property rights and rural enterprise growth: Evidence from land titling reform in China
    Bu, Di
    Liao, Yin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2022, 157