SELECTING SUSTAINABILITY KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR SMART LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT

被引:0
|
作者
Lenort, Radim [1 ]
Wicher, Pavel [1 ]
Samolejova, Andrea [2 ]
Zsifkovits, Helmut [3 ]
Raith, Chaira [3 ]
Miklautsch, Philipp [3 ]
Pelikanova, Jana [2 ]
机构
[1] SKODA AUTO Univ, Dept Prod Logist & Qual Management, Na Karmeli 1457, Mlada Boleslav 29301, Czech Republic
[2] VSB Tech Univ Ostrava, Fac Mat Sci & Technol, Dept Ind Syst Management, 17 Listopadu 2172-15, Ostrava 70800, Czech Republic
[3] Univ Leoben, Chair Ind Logist, Dept Econ & Business Management, Franz Josef Str 18, A-8700 Leoben, Austria
来源
ACTA LOGISTICA | 2022年 / 9卷 / 04期
关键词
smart logistics; sustainability; key performance indicators; industrial enterprise; supply chain; CORPORATE;
D O I
10.22306/al.v9i4.350
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The application of smart technologies and applications is becoming increasingly common in the logistics processes of companies and supply chains. However, standard logistics indicators are still used to evaluate their performance, which contradicts the sustainable development strategy of many industrial enterprises and their supply chains. Thus, the article aims to design a methodology for selecting sustainability key performance indicators (SKPIs) suitable for assessing smart logistics and its technologies and applications. The research relies on cluster analysis of the SKPIs recommended in the relevant literature, frequency analysis of indicators used in practice and their comparison. The cluster analysis showed that the primary attention in the references is given to sustainability's economic and environmental dimensions. Most frequently, the authors highlighted the importance of the following indicators: production-related costs and investments, planning performance and quality, customer satisfaction, energy efficiency, waste intensity and treatment, emissions, and resource efficiency. On the contrary, the frequency analysis corroborated that leading industrial enterprises paid more-or-less balanced attention to all areas of sustainability, but at the company level. The article's primary result constitutes a methodology comprising six steps, respecting the results of the analyses carried out: specialIntscript Sustainability objectives definition; specialIntscript Establishing SKPIs cluster pool; specialIntscript Definition of criteria for selecting SKPIs clusters; specialIntscript Selection of SKPIs clusters; specialIntscript Definition of SKPIs and their parameters; and specialIntscript Development of SKPIs hierarchical structure.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 478
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A framework for selecting indicators of bioenergy sustainability
    Dale, Virginia H.
    Efroymson, Rebecca A.
    Kline, Keith L.
    Davitt, Marcia S.
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2015, 9 (04): : 435 - 446
  • [22] Smart buildings features and key performance indicators: A review
    Al Dakheel, Joud
    Del Pero, Claudio
    Aste, Niccolo
    Leonforte, Fabrizio
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 61
  • [23] SMART CITY: Definition and hvaluation of Key Performance Indicators
    Picioroaga, Irina-Ioana
    Eremia, Mircea
    Sanduleac, Mihai
    [J]. 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION ON ELECTRICAL AND POWER ENGINEERING (EPE), 2018, : 217 - 222
  • [24] Identification of Key Sustainability Performance Indicators and related assessment methods for the carbon fiber recycling sector
    Pillain, Baptiste
    Gemechu, Eskinder
    Sonnemann, Guido
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 72 : 833 - 847
  • [25] Key performance indicators and assessment methods for infrastructure sustainability - a South African construction industry perspective
    Ugwu, O. O.
    Haupt, T. C.
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 42 (02) : 665 - 680
  • [26] THE RELATIONSHIP OF PORT LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS WITH THE INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
    Tavares, Gabriela de Oliveira
    [J]. REVISTA ELETRONICA DE ESTRATEGIA E NEGOCIOS-REEN, 2018, 11 : 80 - 107
  • [27] Evaluating and selecting key performance indicators: an ANP-based model
    Carlucci, Daniela
    [J]. MEASURING BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2010, 14 (02) : 66 - 76
  • [28] A Decision Support Framework based on FCM for Selecting Key Performance Indicators
    Oukhay, Fadwa
    Ben Romdhane, Taieb
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED SYSTEMS AND EMERGENT TECHNOLOGIES IC_ASET'2022), 2022, : 97 - 102
  • [29] Developing key sustainability indicators for assessing green infrastructure performance
    Pakzad, Parisa
    Osmond, Paul
    Corkery, Linda
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL HIGH-PERFORMANCE BUILT ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE - A SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE 2016 SERIES (SBE16), IHBE 2016, 2017, 180 : 146 - 156
  • [30] The diffusion of sustainability key performance indicators in a developing country context
    Thoradeniya, Prabanga
    Ferreira, Aldonio
    Lee, Janet
    Tan, Rebecca
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2021, 34 (05): : 1246 - 1274