Deduction without dogmas: the case of moral analogical argumentation

被引：0
|
作者：
Bermejo-Luque, Lilian [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Philosophy, E-18071 Granada, Spain
来源：
INFORMAL LOGIC | 2014年 / 34卷 / 03期
关键词：
Analogical argumentation; a priori analogical argumentation; deductivism; defeasibility; linguistic normative model; DEFENSE;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
B81 [逻辑学（论理学）];
学科分类号：
010104 ; 010105 ;
摘要：
In a recent paper, Fabio Perin Shecaira (2013) proposes a defence of Waller's deductivist schema for moral analogical argumentation. This defence has several flaws, the most important of them being that many good analogical arguments would be deemed bad or deficient. Additionally, Shecaira misrepresents my alternative account as something in between deductivism and non-deductivism. This paper is both an attempt at solving this misunderstanding and an analysis and criticism of Waller and Shecaira's forms of deductivism.
引用
收藏
页码：311 / 336
页数：26
相关论文
共 50 条
12345