Digital radiography: are the manufacturers' settings too high? Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography system with aid of the computed radiography dose index

被引:36
|
作者
Peters, SE [1 ]
Brennan, PC [1 ]
机构
[1] UCD Sch Diagnost Imaging, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
radiography; digital radiation protection; thoracic radiography; image quality; exposure to patients;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-001-1230-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Manufacturers offer exposure indices as a safeguard against overexposure in computed radiography, but the basis for recommended values is unclear. This study establishes an optimum exposure index to be used as a guideline for a specific CR system to minimise radiation exposures for computed mobile chest radiography, and compares this with manufacturer guidelines and current practice. An anthropomorphic phantom was employed to establish the minimum milliamperes consistent with acceptable image quality for mobile chest radiography images. This was found to be 2 mAs. Consecutively, 10 patients were exposed with this optimised milliampere value and 10 patients were exposed with the 3.2 mAs routinely used in the department of the study. Image quality was objectively assessed using anatomical criteria. Retrospective analyses of 717 exposure indices recorded over 2 months from mobile chest examinations were performed. The optimised milliampere value provided a significant reduction of the average exposure index from 1840 to 1570 (p<0.0001). This new "optimum" exposure index is substantially lower than manufacturer guidelines of 2000 and significantly lower than exposure indices from the retrospective study (1890). Retrospective data showed a significant increase in exposure indices if the examination was performed out of hours. The data provided by this study emphasise the need for clinicians and personnel to consider establishing their own optimum exposure indices for digital investigations rather than simply accepting manufacturers' guidelines. Such an approach, along with regular monitoring of indices, may result in a substantial reduction in patient exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:2381 / 2387
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital radiography: are the manufacturers' settings too high? Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography system with aid of the computed radiography dose index
    Sinead E. Peters
    Patrick C. Brennan
    [J]. European Radiology, 2002, 12 : 2381 - 2387
  • [2] Optimization of Dose and Image Quality for Computed Radiography and Digital Radiography
    John E. Aldrich
    Emerenciana Duran
    Pat Dunlop
    John R. Mayo
    [J]. Journal of Digital Imaging, 2006, 19 : 126 - 131
  • [3] Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography
    Aldrich, JE
    Duran, E
    Dunlop, P
    Mayo, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2006, 19 (02) : 126 - 131
  • [4] New computed radiography technologies in digital radiography
    Fasbender, R
    Schaetzing, R
    [J]. RADIOLOGE, 2003, 43 (05): : 367 - 373
  • [5] Computed and digital radiography
    John Strauss
    [J]. Journal of Digital Imaging, 1998, 11 : 236 - 236
  • [6] Computed and digital radiography
    Strauss, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1998, 11 (03) : 236 - 236
  • [7] Dose optimisation in computed radiography
    Schreiner-Karoussou, A
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 117 (1-3) : 139 - 142
  • [8] PATIENT DOSE ASSESSMENT AND OPTIMISATION OF PELVIC RADIOGRAPHY WITH COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS
    Abbeyquaye, D.
    Inkoom, S.
    Hammond, N. B.
    Fletcher, J. J.
    Botwe, B. O.
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2021, 195 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [9] Quality and dose optimization in canine chest radiography using a digital radiography system
    Santana de Souza, Sergio Augusto
    Fattori Alves, Allan Felipe
    Mamprim, Maria Jaqueline
    Pina, Diana Rodrigues
    [J]. RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2022, 195
  • [10] Megavoltage radiation dose response of digital computed radiography
    Wang, ZH
    Wu, QRJ
    Sibata, CH
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2001: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2001, 4320 : 236 - 243