Should men with serum prostate-specific antigen ≤4 ng/ml and normal digital rectal examination undergo a prostate biopsy?: A literature review

被引:14
|
作者
Pepe, Pietro [1 ]
Panella, Paolo [1 ]
D'Arrigo, Letterio [1 ]
Savoca, Francesco [1 ]
Pennisi, Michele [1 ]
Aragona, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Osped Cannizzaro, Urol Unit, IT-95126 Catania, Italy
关键词
biopsy; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; radical prostatectomy; screening;
D O I
10.1159/000092583
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The clinical significance of a prostate cancer (PCa) cannot be determined solely by tumor volume (<= 0.5 cm(3)), as small tumors of higher Gleason grade and tumors occurring in younger men may become clinically significant even though the initial volume at diagnosis is small. A certain number of these minimal cancers are likely to remain clinically insignificant; however, it is unpredictable how many can progress beyond the curable stage by the time there is a rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values. Compared to clinically detected PCa, PCa detected exclusively by PSA screening (clinical stage T1c) are less likely to be advanced but no more likely to be insignificant in terms of volume, pathologic stage, and Gleason pattern. Only 10-15% of PSA-detected cancers have the features of PCa found at autopsy or in cystoprostatectomy specimens. Actually, 25-30% of PCa are detected with PSA values between 2.5 and 4 ng/ml, and most of these cancers are clinically significant. Evidence from both retrospective and longitudinal studies has shown that the risk of a PCa is dependent on the patient's age and the initial serum PSA. This allows an individualized approach to PCa screening programs, and PSA cutoff values for biopsy indication may be lowered in selected patients. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 89
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Complexed prostate-specific antigen, and complext prostate-specific antigen indices for early detection of prostate cancer in men with total prostate-specific antigen between 2.0 and 4.0 ng/ml
    Reissigl, A
    Remzi, M
    Wiunig, C
    Zlotta, A
    Ravery, V
    Hammerer, P
    Dobronski, P
    Kaisary, A
    Marberger, M
    Djavan, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04): : 426 - 427
  • [32] Stratifying the initial prostate cancer suspicion to avoid magnetic resonance exams by sequencing men according to serum prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination and the prostate-specific antigen density based on digital rectal prostate volume category
    Morote, Juan
    Triquell, Marina
    Campistol, Miriam
    Abascal, Jose M.
    Servian, Pol
    Trilla, Enrique
    [J]. BJUI COMPASS, 2023, 4 (03): : 266 - 268
  • [33] THE EFFECT OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION ON PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVELS
    CRAWFORD, ED
    SCHUTZ, MJ
    CLEJAN, S
    DRAGO, J
    RESNICK, MI
    CHODAK, GW
    GOMELLA, LG
    AUSTENFELD, M
    STONE, NN
    MILES, BJ
    THOMSON, R
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (16): : 2227 - 2228
  • [34] PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AS A PREDICTOR OF AN ABNORMAL DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION
    LUI, PD
    TERRIS, MK
    HANEY, DJ
    CONSTANTINOU, CE
    STAMEY, TA
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 74 (03): : 337 - 340
  • [35] Positive prostate biopsy rate consistently increases with age at the same prostate-specific antigen level in patients with normal digital rectal examination
    Orozco, R
    Kunnel, B
    O'Dowd, GJ
    Stamey, TA
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1998, 51 (04) : 531 - 533
  • [36] Use of percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to identify men at high risk of prostate cancer when PSA levels are 2.51 to 4 ng/mL and digital rectal examination is not suspicious for prostate cancer: An alternative model
    Catalona, WJ
    Partin, AW
    Finlay, JA
    Chan, DW
    Rittenhouse, HG
    Wolfert, RL
    Woodrum, DL
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1999, 54 (02) : 220 - 224
  • [37] Comparison of percent free prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density as methods to enhance prostate specific antigen specificity in early prostate cancer detection in men with normal rectal examination and prostate specific antigen between 4.1 and 10 ng/ml
    Morote, J
    Raventos, CX
    Lorente, JA
    LopezPacios, MA
    Encabo, G
    deTorres, I
    Andreu, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (02): : 502 - 504
  • [38] Serum ribonuclease activity in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in men with serum prostate-specific antigen levels between 2.5 and 20 ng/mL
    Eskicorapci, SY
    Özkara, HA
    Önder, E
    Akdogan, B
    Erkan, I
    Ciliv, G
    Ozen, H
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2006, 39 (04) : 363 - 366
  • [39] Diagnostic efficacy of free prostate-specific antigen/total prostate-specific antigen ratio for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in low concentration (≤4 ng/ml) and intermediate levels of total prostate-specific antigen (4.01-10.0 ng/ml)
    Caliskan, Selahattin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 13 (02) : 279 - 283
  • [40] Serum pro-prostate specific antigen preferentially detects aggressive prostate cancers in men with 2 to 4 ng/ml prostate specific antigen
    Catalona, WJ
    Bartsch, G
    Rittenhouse, HG
    Evans, CL
    Linton, HJ
    Horninger, W
    Klocker, H
    Mikolajczyk, SD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (06): : 2239 - 2244