The clinical value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the microbiological diagnosis of skin and soft tissue infections

被引:37
|
作者
Wang, Qingqing [1 ]
Miao, Qing [1 ]
Pan, Jue [1 ]
Jin, Wenting [1 ]
Ma, Yuyan [1 ]
Zhang, Yao [1 ]
Yao, Yumeng [1 ]
Su, Yi [1 ]
Huang, Yingnan [1 ]
Li, Bing [1 ]
Wang, Mengran [1 ]
Li, Na [1 ]
Cai, Sishi [1 ]
Luo, Yu [1 ]
Zhou, Chunmei [2 ]
Wu, Honglong [3 ]
Hu, Bijie [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Infect Dis, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Dept Microbiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
关键词
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing; Skin and soft tissue infections; Sensitivity; Diagnostic; Antibiotic treatment;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.007
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), with its comprehensiveness, is widely applied in microbiological diagnosis. Etiological diagnosis is of paramount clinical importance in patients with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). However, the clinical application of mNGS in SSTIs is relatively less studied. Materials and methods: From April 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019, 96 SSTI cases were collected. The positive rates of pathogens detected by mNGS and culture were compared by analyzing tissue samples, pus, swabs, and/or interstitial fluids obtained from the infected parts. Modification of the antibiotic treatment strategy due to mNGS was also assessed. Results: The sensitivity of mNGS for detecting pathogens in SSTI cases was superior to that of culture testing (67.7% vs 35.4%; p < 0.01). Significantly higher identification rates for viruses (10.4% vs 0.0%; p < 0.01) and anaerobes (11.5% vs 1.0%; p < 0.01) were obtained with mNGS compared to culture. Of note, rare pathogens such as Vibrio vulnificus and Bartonella henselae were also detected by mNGS. Importantly, the proportion of multi-pathogen SSTIs detected by mNGS was higher than that of multi-pathogen SSTIs detected by culture (16.7% vs 6.3%; p = 0.035). The rate of targeted antibiotic treatment was significantly higher in mNGS-positive cases than in mNGS-negative cases (41.7% vs 3.8%; p < 0.01). In culture-negative and mNGS-positive cases, the improvement rate was higher than that in mNGS-negative cases, but this was not statistically significant (75.0% vs 73.1%; p = 0.864). Conclusions: mNGS is a promising tool for the etiological diagnosis of SSTIs, particularly in identifying viruses, anaerobes, and multi-pathogen infections. The application of mNGS testing in clinical practice could change antibiotic treatment strategies and partly benefit clinical outcomes. (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 420
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Metagenomic next-generation sequencing of osteoarticular tissue for the diagnosis of suspected osteoarticular tuberculosis
    Yan, Guangxuan
    Liu, Zhifeng
    Teng, Tianlu
    Dong, Weijie
    Lan, Tinglong
    Fan, Jun
    Tang, Kai
    Qin, Shibing
    Nie, Wenjuan
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2024, 12 (12)
  • [32] Leishmaniasis Diagnosis via Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing
    Chen, Hongbin
    Fan, Chunhong
    Gao, Hua
    Yin, Yuyao
    Wang, Xiaojuan
    Zhang, Yawei
    Wang, Hui
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [33] Neurocysticercosis: diagnosis via metagenomic next-generation sequencing
    Pedrosa, Denison Alves
    Bruniera, Gustavo Peres Fernandes
    Godoy, Luis Filipe de Souza
    Felicio, Andre C.
    Pinho, Joao Rebello
    Doi, Andre Mario
    Gleizer, Rene de Araujo
    PRACTICAL NEUROLOGY, 2023, 23 (06) : 509 - 511
  • [34] Metagenomic next-generation sequencing clinches diagnosis of leishmaniasis
    Wang, Chong
    Li, Ang
    Shi, Qingmiao
    Yu, Zujiang
    LANCET, 2021, 397 (10280): : 1213 - 1213
  • [35] Value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of native pyogenic spinal infections: a multicenter, retrospective observational study
    Li, Zhaohui
    Zhang, Qiang
    Lian, Xiaofeng
    Yin, Chuqiang
    Lin, Yuhan
    Wang, Yuelei
    Han, Zengshuai
    Shen, Feng
    Xu, Yidan
    Wang, Huafeng
    Wang, Ting
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 25 (04): : 640 - 648
  • [36] The clinical value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and the exploration of lung microbiota characteristics
    Yan Yong
    Lihong Zhou
    Xiaojing Zhang
    Xiaoqin Ran
    Yuxin Guo
    Wei Gai
    Yuanyuan Chen
    Scientific Reports, 15 (1)
  • [37] THE CLINICAL VALUE OF β-D-GLUCAN TESTING AND NEXT-GENERATION METAGENOMIC SEQUENCING FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF FUNGAL ENDOPHTHALMITIS
    Li, Yuxin
    Qian, Zhuyun
    Chen, Huagui
    Zhang, Shuguang
    Wang, Ruifeng
    Yu, Shuhuan
    Chen, Li
    Wang, Lu
    Xu, Songtao
    Tao, Yong
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2024, 44 (07): : 1209 - 1216
  • [38] The clinical value of valve metagenomic next-generation sequencing when applied to the etiological diagnosis of infective endocarditis
    Cai, Sishi
    Yang, Ye
    Pan, Jue
    Miao, Qing
    Jin, Wenting
    Ma, Yuyan
    Zhou, Chunmei
    Gao, Xiaodong
    Wang, Chunsheng
    Hu, Bijie
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (19)
  • [39] Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the aetiological diagnosis of Mycobacterium marinum infections: A pilot study
    Gu, Ankang
    Jiang, Junqing
    Ma, Faku
    Zhang, Litao
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY VENEREOLOGY & LEPROLOGY, 2023, 89 (05): : 745 - 748
  • [40] Metagenomic next-generation sequencing aids the diagnosis of viral infections in febrile returning travellers
    Jerome, Hanna
    Taylor, Callum
    Sreenu, Vattipally B.
    Klymenko, Tanya
    Filipe, Ana Da Silva
    Jackson, Celia
    Davis, Chris
    Ashraf, Shirin
    Wilson-Davies, Eleri
    Jesudason, Natasha
    Devine, Karen
    Harder, Lisbeth
    Aitken, Celia
    Gunson, Rory
    Thomson, Emma C.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2019, 79 (04) : 383 - 388