Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact

被引:50
|
作者
Wenke, Rachel J. [1 ,2 ]
Ward, Elizabeth C. [3 ,4 ]
Hickman, Ingrid [5 ]
Hulcombe, Julie [6 ]
Phillips, Rachel [7 ]
Mickan, Sharon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Gold Coast Hlth, Clin Governance Educ & Res Allied Hlth, 1 Hosp Blvd, Southport, Qld 4215, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Sch Allied Hlth Sci, Parklands Dr, Southport, Qld 4215, Australia
[3] Metro South Hosp & Hlth Serv, Dept Hlth, Ctr Functioning & Hlth Res, Eight Mile Plains, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Level 7,Therapies Bldg,Serv Rd, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[5] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Nutr & Dietet, Ground Floor,Bldg 15,Ipswich Rd, Woolloongabba, Qld 4102, Australia
[6] Allied Hlth Profess Off Queensland, Dept Hlth, Level 1,15 Butterfield St, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
[7] West Moreton Hosp & Hlth Serv, Ipswich Hosp, POB 73, Ipswich, Qld 4305, Australia
来源
关键词
Allied health; Research personnel; Capacity building; NEW-SOUTH-WALES; BUILDING RESEARCH CAPACITY; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; WORKFORCE; PROFESSIONALS; EXPERIENCE; RETENTION; STRATEGY; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12961-016-0166-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Research positions embedded within healthcare settings have been identified as an enabler to allied health professional (AHP) research capacity; however, there is currently limited research formally evaluating their impact. In 2008, a Health Practitioner industrial agreement funded a research capacity building initiative within Queensland Health, Australia, which included 15 new allied health research positions. The present project used a qualitative and realist approach to explore the impact of these research positions, as well as the mechanisms which facilitated or hindered their success within their respective organisations. Methods: Forty-four AHP employees from six governmental health services in Queensland, Australia, participated in the study. Individual interviews were undertaken, with individuals in research positions (n = 8) and their reporting line managers (n = 8). Four stakeholder focus groups were also conducted with clinicians, team leaders and professional heads who had engaged with the research positions. Results: Nine key outcomes of the research positions were identified across individual, team/service and organisational/community levels. These outcomes included clinician skill development, increased research activity, clinical and service changes, increased research outputs and collaborations, enhanced research and workplace culture, improved profile of allied health, development of research infrastructure, and professional development of individuals in the research positions. Different mechanisms that influenced these outcomes were identified. These mechanisms were grouped by those related to the (1) research position itself, (2) organisational factors and (3) implementation factors. Conclusions: The present findings highlight the potential value of the research positions for individuals, teams and clinical services across different governmental healthcare services, and demonstrate the impact of the roles on building the internal and external profile of allied health. Results build upon the emerging evidence base for allied health research positions and have important implications for a number of stakeholders (i.e. individuals in the research positions, AHPs and their managers, university partners and state-wide executives). Key recommendations are provided for all stakeholders to enhance the ongoing impact of these roles and the potential advocacy for additional positions and resources to support them.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The health service perspective on determinants of success in allied health student research project collaborations: a qualitative study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
    Angus, Rebecca L.
    Hattingh, H. Laetitia
    Weir, Kelly A.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [32] Qualitative Health Psychology Research: Diversity, Power, and Impact INTRODUCTION
    Gough, Brendan
    Deatrick, Janet A.
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 34 (04) : 289 - 292
  • [33] Essentials on qualitative research methods: Clinical considerations for allied professionals
    Beery, Theresa A.
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2010, 7 (04) : 572 - 574
  • [34] Research culture in a regional allied health setting
    Borkowski, Donna
    McKinstry, Carol
    Cotchett, Matthew
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2017, 23 (03) : 300 - 306
  • [35] ANATOMY OF RESEARCH IN ALLIED HEALTH - STEIN,F
    MORTON, KC
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1977, 11 (10) : 575 - 575
  • [36] Exploration of the representation of the allied health professions in senior leadership positions in the UK National Health Service
    Eddison, Nicola
    Healy, Aoife
    Darke, Nina
    Jones, Mary
    Leask, Millar
    Roberts, Gwen L.
    Chockalingam, Nachiappan
    [J]. BMJ LEADER, 2024, 8 (02) : 119 - 126
  • [37] ANATOMY OF RESEARCH IN ALLIED HEALTH - STEIN,F
    SCHULE, K
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 1980, 3 (02) : 301 - 302
  • [38] Research culture in allied health: a systematic review
    Borkowski, Donna
    McKinstry, Carol
    Cotchett, Matthew
    Williams, Cylie
    Haines, Terry
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2016, 22 (04) : 294 - 303
  • [39] ANATOMY OF RESEARCH IN ALLIED HEALTH - STEIN,F
    不详
    [J]. REHABILITATION LITERATURE, 1977, 38 (08) : 260 - 260
  • [40] ANATOMY OF RESEARCH IN ALLIED HEALTH - STEIN,F
    MCGURRIN, MC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 1982, 11 (1-2) : 161 - 162