Comparison of two moving target detector's performance

被引：0
|
作者：
Li, H
Chen, YH
Liu, H
机构：
来源：
ICSP '96 - 1996 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS I AND II | 1996年
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号：
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要：
This paper compares two kinds of moving target detector: AMTD-CFAR (Adaptive Moving Target Detection CFAR) and OS-CFAR detector. Their detection performance is investigated for different situation such as different distribution, uniform background, clutter edge and strong interference target. The results indicate that AMTD-CFAR detector has very small loss of CFAR, it's detection performance is better than that of OS-CFAR detector for different distribution, uniform background , especially in multiple-target environment.
引用
收藏
页码：867 / 870
页数：4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Performance Modeling of Moving Target Defenses with Reconfiguration Limits
    Connell, Warren
    Menasce, Daniel A.
    Albanese, Massimiliano
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEPENDABLE AND SECURE COMPUTING, 2021, 18 (01) : 205 - 219
  • [42] Moving target interception: Effects of target motion characteristics on eye movements and performance
    Jongil, Lim
    Carlton, Les G.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 35 : S36 - S37
  • [43] Comparison of performance limits of infrared detector materials
    Rogalski, A
    PHOTODETECTOR MATERIALS AND DEVICES VII, 2002, 4650 : 117 - 127
  • [44] Interferometric comparison of the performance of a CMOS and sCMOS detector
    Flores-Moreno, J. M.
    De la Torre, Manuel H., I
    del Socorro Hernandez-Montes, M.
    Perez-Lopez, Carlos
    Mendoza, Fernando S.
    SPECKLE 2015: VI INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SPECKLE METROLOGY, 2015, 9660
  • [45] Performance Comparison of Envelope Detector for RFID Applications
    Fahsyar, Puteri Nor Aznie S. M.
    Soin, Norhayati
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR TECHNICAL POSTGRADUATES (TECHPOS 2009), 2009, : 173 - 175
  • [46] Comparison of dual energy detector system performance
    Alvarez, RE
    Seibert, JA
    Thompson, SK
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (03) : 556 - 565
  • [47] Performance Comparison between Two Kinds of Filtering Algorithms for Target-track Prediction
    Song Hui-bo
    Fan Hui-bing
    Zhang Bing
    ISTM/2009: 8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TEST AND MEASUREMENT, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 1026 - 1028
  • [48] Performance Comparison of Two Types of Auditory Perceptual Features in Robust Underwater Target Classification
    Yang, Lixue
    Chen, Kean
    ACTA ACUSTICA UNITED WITH ACUSTICA, 2017, 103 (01) : 56 - 66
  • [49] IMRT delivery to a moving target by dynamic MLC tracking: Delivery for targets moving in two dimensions in the beam's-eye view
    McQuaid, D.
    Webb, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2296 - 2297
  • [50] Real-Time Performance Comparison of Vision-Based Autonomous Landing of Quadcopter on a Ground Moving Target
    Kumar, Amit
    IETE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 2023, 69 (08) : 5455 - 5472
12345