Multi-objective optimization of hybrid backorder inventory model

被引:23
|
作者
Srivastav, Achin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Agrawal, Sunil [1 ]
机构
[1] Pandit Dwarka Prasad Mishra Indian Inst Informat, Jabalpur, MP, India
[2] Pandit Dwarka Prasad Mishra Indian Inst Informat, Dept Mech Engn, Jabalpur Dumna Airport Rd,PO Khamaria, Jabalpur, MP, India
[3] Flat E-801, Jaipur 302001, Rajasthan, India
关键词
Backorder; Inventory; Multi-objective particle swarm optimization; Pareto; Multi-objective genetic algorithm; SUPPLY CHAIN PROBLEM; NSGA-II; PARETO-OPTIMALITY; EOQ MODEL; MOPSO;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2015.12.032
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper addresses inventory problem for the products that are sold in monopolistic and captive markets experiencing hybrid backorder (i.e., fixed backorder and time-weighted backorder). The problem with stochastic demand is studied first by developing single objective (cost) inventory model. Computational results of a numerical problem show the effectiveness of hybrid backorder inventory model over fixed backorder inventory model. The model is later extended to multi-objective inventory model. Three objectives of multi-objective inventory model are the minimization of total cost, minimization of stockout units and minimization of the frequency of stockout. A multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm is used to solve the inventory model and generate Pareto curves. The Pareto curves obtained for hybrid backorder inventory model are compared with the existing Pareto curves that are based on fixed backorder. The results show a substantial reduction in stockout units and frequency of stockout with a marginal rise in cost with proposed hybrid backorder inventory system in comparison to existing fixed backorder inventory system. Sensitivity analysis is done to study the robustness of total cost, order quantity, and safety stock factor with the change in holding cost. In the end, the performance of the MOPSO algorithm is compared with the multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA). The metrics that are used for the performance measurement of the algorithms are error ratio, spacing and maximum spread. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 84
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hybrid immune algorithm with EDA for multi-objective optimization
    Qi, Yu-Tao
    Liu, Fang
    Liu, Jing-Le
    Ren, Yuan
    Jiao, Li-Cheng
    [J]. Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software, 2013, 24 (10): : 2251 - 2266
  • [32] Multi-objective Optimization on DVFS based Hybrid Systems
    Gadou, Mohamed
    Mogili, Sankeerth Reddy
    Banerjee, Tania
    Ranka, Sanjay
    [J]. 2019 TENTH INTERNATIONAL GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE COMPUTING CONFERENCE (IGSC), 2019,
  • [33] Multi-Objective Design Optimization for Flexible Hybrid Electronics
    Bhat, Ganapati
    Gupta, Ujjwal
    Tran, Nicholas
    Park, Jaehyun
    Ozev, Sule
    Ogras, Umit Y.
    [J]. 2016 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (ICCAD), 2016,
  • [34] Multi-objective optimization of the sizing of a hybrid electrical vehicle
    Reinbold, Vincent
    Gerbaud, Laurent
    Vinot, Emmanuel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED ELECTROMAGNETICS AND MECHANICS, 2017, 53 : S179 - S190
  • [35] Hybrid Multi-Objective Optimization Approach in Water Flooding
    Al-Aghbari, Mohammed
    Gujarathi, Ashish M.
    Al-Wadhahi, Majid
    Chakraborti, Nirupam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2022, 144 (06):
  • [36] A Hybrid Development Platform for Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization
    Shen, Ruimin
    Zheng, Jinhua
    Li, Miqing
    [J]. 2015 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2015, : 1885 - 1892
  • [37] A Novel Hybrid Multi-objective Optimization Framework: Rotating the Objective Space
    Qiu, Xin
    Huang, Ye
    Xu, Jian-Xin
    Tan, Kay Chen
    [J]. SIMULATED EVOLUTION AND LEARNING (SEAL 2014), 2014, 8886 : 192 - 203
  • [38] Hybrid multi-objective optimization algorithm using Taylor series model and Spider Monkey Optimization
    Menon, Radhika
    Kulkarni, Anju
    Singh, Deepak
    Venkatesan, Mithra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2021, 122 (10) : 2478 - 2497
  • [39] Multi-objective optimization for SVM model selection
    Chatelain, C.
    Adam, S.
    Lecourtier, Y.
    Heutte, L.
    Paquet, T.
    [J]. ICDAR 2007: NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DOCUMENT ANALYSIS AND RECOGNITION, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 427 - 431
  • [40] A Multi-objective Optimization Model for Music Styles
    Malandrino, Delfina
    Zaccagnino, Rocco
    Zizza, Rosalba
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (CSAI 2018) / 2018 THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGY (ICIMT 2018), 2018, : 247 - 251