Dissociating striatal and hippocampal function developmentally with a stimulus-response compatibility task

被引:0
|
作者
Casey, BJ
Thomas, KM
Davidson, MC
Kunz, K
Franzen, PL
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Ctr, Sackler Inst Dev Psychobiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Psychol, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE | 2002年 / 22卷 / 19期
关键词
development; basal ganglia; hippocampus; imaging; learning; fMRI; children;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The current study examined the development of cognitive and neural systems involved in overriding a learned action in favor of a new one using a stimulus-response compatibility task and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Eight right-handed adults (mean age, 22-30 years), and eight children (7-11 years) were scanned while they performed a task. Both children and adults were less accurate for incompatible stimulus-response mappings than compatible ones; the children's performance was significantly worse. The comparison of the incompatible and compatible conditions showed large volumes of activity in the ventral prefrontal cortex, ventral caudate nucleus, thalamus, and hippocampus. Striatal activity correlated with the percentage of errors in overriding the old stimulus-response association. The hippocampal activity correlated with the reaction time to make a response to a new stimulus-response mapping that required the reversal of a prior association between a stimulus and a response location. Developmental differences were observed in the volume of striatal/pallidal and hippocampal/ para-hippocampal activity in that these regions were larger and extended more ventrally in children relative to adults. These results suggest that with maturation and learning, projections to and from these regions may become more refined and focal. Moreover, these findings are consistent with the role of ventral frontostriatal circuitry in overriding habitual and well learned actions and hippocampal systems in learning and reversing associations between a given stimulus and spatial location.
引用
收藏
页码:8647 / 8652
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stimulus-response compatibility is information-action compatibility
    Stins, JF
    Michaels, CF
    ECOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 9 (01) : 25 - 45
  • [32] Stimulus modality and stimulus-response compatibility in absolute identification
    Lacouture, Y
    Lacerte, D
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 1997, 51 (02): : 165 - 170
  • [33] Orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects emerge even when the stimulus position is task irrelevant
    Nishimura, Akio
    Yokosawa, Kazuhiko
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 59 (06): : 1021 - 1032
  • [34] CHANGES IN MEDIAL CORTICAL BLOOD-FLOW WITH A STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY TASK
    TAYLOR, SF
    KORNBLUM, S
    MINOSHIMA, S
    OLIVER, LM
    KOEPPE, RA
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1994, 32 (02) : 249 - 255
  • [35] Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects
    Yang Seok Cho
    Robert W. Proctor
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2003, 10 : 45 - 73
  • [36] Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects
    Cho, YS
    Proctor, RW
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2003, 10 (01) : 45 - 73
  • [37] STIMULUS CONGRUENCE AND STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY - 2 VARIABLES DISENTANGLED IN AN AUDITORY REACTION-TIME-TASK
    RAGOT, R
    GUIARD, Y
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 4 (03): : 219 - 232
  • [38] Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and negative priming
    Read, LE
    Proctor, RW
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2004, 11 (01) : 41 - 48
  • [39] Stimulus-response compatibility and affective computing: a review
    Lemmens, P. M. C.
    De Haan, A.
    Van Galen, G. P.
    Meulenbroek, R. G. J.
    THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2007, 8 (06) : 583 - 600
  • [40] ATTENTIONAL FOCUSING AND SPATIAL STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY
    STOFFER, TH
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1991, 53 (02): : 127 - 135