Reactor ageing and phase-out policies: global and regional prospects for nuclear power generation

被引:14
|
作者
Carrara, Samuel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Eni Enrico Mattei FEEM, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Renewable & Appropriate Energy Lab RAEL, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Directorate Energy Transport & Climate C, Westerduinweg 3, NL-1755 LE Petten, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Nuclear; Power generation; Climate change mitigation; Integrated assessment models; SYSTEM INTEGRATION; UNCERTAINTY; TECHNOLOGY; FUTURE; ENERGY; WITCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111834
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Nuclear is considered as a valuable option for the decarbonization of power generation, as it is a no-carbon, yet commercially consolidated technology. However, its real prospects are uncertain, especially in the OECD countries. The main aim of this work is to explore the techno-economic implications of policy-relevant scenarios for nuclear power, designed on the actual prospects in the world regions and developed with the Integrated Assessment Model WITCH. The analysis shows that nuclear generation constantly grows over the century, even if in general the nuclear share in the global electricity mix does not significantly change over time. If constraints are applied to nuclear deployment, the contribution of this technology is compensated by renewables (mainly wind and solar PV) and, to a lower extent, by CCS. The policy costs related to nuclear phase-out are moderate, as they are almost completely compensated by innovation and technology benefits in renewables and energy efficiency. Phase-out policies applied only to the OECD regions do not entail any additional policy costs in these regions, while non-OECD regions marginally benefit from lower uranium prices.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energy market impacts of nuclear power phase-out policies
    Solveig Glomsrød
    Taoyuan Wei
    Torben Mideksa
    Bjørn H. Samset
    [J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2015, 20 : 1511 - 1527
  • [2] Energy market impacts of nuclear power phase-out policies
    Glomsrod, Solveig
    Wei, Taoyuan
    Mideksa, Torben
    Samset, Bjorn H.
    [J]. MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2015, 20 (08) : 1511 - 1527
  • [3] Phase-in and phase-out policies in the global steel transition
    Algers, Jonas
    Ahman, Max
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2024,
  • [4] NUCLEAR-POWER, PHASE-OUT OR DEVELOPMENT
    GAVELIN, G
    [J]. SVENSK PAPPERSTIDNING-NORDISK CELLULOSA, 1995, 98 (11): : 18 - 18
  • [5] Assessing nuclear phase-out
    Rausch, Sebastian
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 12 (04) : 314 - 315
  • [6] Effects of Nuclear Power Phase-out in Germany on the Austrian Power System
    Holzer, Andreas
    Le Anh Tuan
    [J]. 2015 IEEE EINDHOVEN POWERTECH, 2015,
  • [7] Assessing nuclear phase-out
    Sebastian Rausch
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2022, 12 : 314 - 315
  • [8] Nuclear Phase-out Under Stringent Climate Policies: A Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis
    Bretschger, Lucas
    Zhang, Lin
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (01): : 167 - 194
  • [9] Swiss reject nuclear phase-out
    不详
    [J]. PHYSICS WORLD, 2017, 30 (01) : 9 - 9
  • [10] Impact of the German nuclear phase-out on Europe's electricity generation
    Bruninx, Kenneth
    Madzharov, Darin
    Delarue, Erik
    D'haeseleer, William
    [J]. 2012 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE EUROPEAN ENERGY MARKET (EEM), 2012,