Modeling the impact of safety climate on process safety in a modern process industry: The case of the UAE's oil-refining industry

被引:3
|
作者
Al Mazrouei, Mohamed Ali [1 ]
Khalid, Khalizani [1 ]
Davidson, Ross [1 ]
机构
[1] Abu Dhabi Univ, Coll Business, POB 59911, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
来源
COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT | 2019年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词
UAE; oil refining industry; safety climate; process safety; structural equation modeling; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; WORKPLACE SAFETY; HEALTH-CARE; CULTURE; MULTILEVEL; RISK; OUTCOMES; ORGANIZATION; PERCEPTIONS; ACCIDENTS;
D O I
10.1080/23311975.2019.1647591
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study examines the psychometric properties of process safety and models the relationships between top management commitment to safety (Model 1), top management safety practices (Model 2), and supervisory safety behavior (Model 3). It is hypothesized that these determinants are positively related to process safety. Data were provided by 180 workers in an oil refining company in the UAE. The results show high reliability in the overall process safety score and dimensions (employees' engagement in safety, employees' safety performance, and safe working environment). Confirmatory factor analyses indicate that 12 items can be combined into a higher-order process safety factor model. The findings from the controlled models demonstrate that top management commitment to safety, top management safety practices, and supervisory safety behavior are positively and significantly related to process safety and its dimensions. By contrast, in the freely estimated model, top management commitment to safety and top management safety practices are not significantly related to process safety. Overall, process safety has very good psychometric properties, suggesting that it can be used for safety research and future research related to psychological-behavioral safety.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An Industry's Call to Understand the Contingencies Involved in Process Safety: Normalization of Deviance
    Bogard, Kevin
    Ludwig, Timothy D.
    Staats, Chris
    Kretschmer, Danielle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT, 2015, 35 (1-2) : 70 - 80
  • [43] Stakeholder outreach on process safety for process industry using risk based approaches
    Jayaraman, Siti Nur Balqis Fauzi Rahman
    Shariff, Azmi Mohd
    Zaini, Dzulkarnain
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2020, 39 (S1)
  • [44] Analysis of Process Safety and Occupational Health in Leather Process Industry: A Holistic Approach
    Sivakumar, Venkatasubramanian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN LEATHER CHEMISTS ASSOCIATION, 2021, 116 (12): : 428 - 434
  • [45] US oil industry's safety record improves
    不详
    [J]. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1998, 96 (21) : 24 - 24
  • [46] Systematic impact of institutional pressures on safety climate in the construction industry
    He, Qinghua
    Dong, Shuang
    Rose, Timothy
    Li, Heng
    Yin, Qin
    Cao, Dongping
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2016, 93 : 230 - 239
  • [47] Safety of the process industries in the 21st century: A changing need of process safety management for a changing industry
    Knegtering, B.
    Pasman, H. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2009, 22 (02) : 162 - 168
  • [48] Positive organizational behavior and safety in the offshore oil industry: Exploring the determinants of positive safety climate
    Hystad, Sigurd W.
    Bartone, Paul T.
    Eid, Jarle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 9 (01): : 42 - 53
  • [49] Safety compliance and safety climate: A repeated cross-sectional study in the oil and gas industry
    Kvalheim, Sverre A.
    Dahl, Oyvind
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2016, 59 : 33 - 41
  • [50] A regulatory view of deterministic safety analysis in the nuclear industry (some lessons for the process industry?)
    Trimble, A
    [J]. HAZARDS XVI: ANALYSING THE PAST, PLANNING THE FUTURE, 2001, (148): : 748 - 760