A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cystic fibrosis

被引:12
|
作者
Ratnayake, Irushi [1 ]
Ahern, Susannah [1 ]
Ruseckaite, Rasa [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Clayton, Vic, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 10期
关键词
public health; cystic fibrosis; mental health; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; LEICESTER COUGH QUESTIONNAIRE; ADULT PATIENTS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS; CFQ-R; HEALTH; CHILDREN; DEPRESSION; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033867
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background To determine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) which may be suitable for incorporation into the Australian Cystic Fibrosis Data Registry (ACFDR) by identifying PROMs administered in adult and paediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) populations in the last decade. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library databases for studies published between January 2009 and February 2019 describing the use of PROMs to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adult and paediatric patients with CF. Validation studies, observational studies and qualitative studies were included. The search was conducted on 13 February 2019. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments Risk of Bias Checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. Results Twenty-seven different PROMs were identified. The most commonly used PROMs were designed specifically for CF. Equal numbers of studies were conducted on adult (32%, n=31), paediatric (35%, n=34) and both (27%, n=26) populations. No PROMs were used within a clinical registry setting previously. The two most widely used PROMs, the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) and the Cystic Fibrosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (CFQoL), demonstrated good psychometric properties and acceptability in English-speaking populations. Discussion We found that although PROMs are widely used in CF, there is a lack of reporting on the efficacy of methods and timepoints of administration. We identified the CFQ-R and CFQoL as the most suitable for incorporation in the ACFDR as they captured significant effects of CF on HRQoL and were reliable and valid in CF populations. These PROMs will be used in a further qualitative study assessing patients' with CF and clinicians' perspectives toward the acceptability and feasibility of incorporating a PROM in the ACFDR. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019126931.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Dermatology: A Systematic Review
    Pattinson, Rachael L.
    Trialonis-Suthakharan, Nirohshah
    Gupta, Sunnia
    Henry, Alasdair L.
    Lavallee, Jacqueline F.
    Otten, Marina
    Pickles, Timothy
    Courtier, Nick
    Austin, Jennifer
    Janus, Christine
    Augustin, Matthias
    Bundy, Chris
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2021, 101
  • [42] Patient-reported outcome measures for asthma: a systematic review
    Worth, Allison
    Hammersley, Victoria
    Knibb, Rebecca
    Flokstra-de-Blok, Bertine
    DunnGalvin, Audrey
    Walker, Samantha
    Dubois, Anthony E. J.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 24
  • [43] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Pelvic Floor Disorders
    Engy Habashy
    Ayman E. Mahdy
    Current Urology Reports, 2019, 20
  • [44] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in shoulder and elbow surgery
    Jessen, Malik
    Lappen, Sebastian
    Schneider, Marco
    OBERE EXTREMITAET-SCHULTER-ELLENBOGEN-HAND-UPPER EXTREMITY-SHOULDER ELBOW HAND, 2021, 16 (03): : 215 - 220
  • [45] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Pelvic Floor Disorders
    Habashy, Engy
    Mahdy, Ayman E.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 20 (05)
  • [46] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as proof of treatment efficacy
    Kluzek, Stefan
    Dean, Benjamin
    Wartolowska, Karolina A.
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2022, 27 (03) : 153 - 155
  • [47] A review of the barriers to using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in routine cancer care
    Hanh Nguyen
    Butow, Phyllis
    Dhillon, Haryana
    Sundaresan, Puma
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2021, 68 (02) : 186 - 195
  • [48] Review The appropriateness and quality of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in plastic surgery randomized controlled trials: A systematic review
    Kim, Patrick J.
    Hircock, Caroline
    Huynh, Minh N. Q.
    Gallo, Lucas
    Thoma, Achilles
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2023, 85 : 72 - 85
  • [49] Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol
    Bull, Claudia
    Teede, Helena
    Carrandi, Lane
    Rigney, Azure
    Cusack, Sally
    Callander, Emily
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [50] Mental health and neurodevelopmental patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for children and young people with epilepsy: A systematic review
    De Aveiro, Bianca
    Winsor, Alice
    Davies, Jessica
    Nicholson, Timothy R.
    Pal, Deb K.
    Richardson, Mark P.
    Pick, Susannah
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2024, 153