Development of in vitro systems for nanotoxicology: methodological considerations

被引:302
|
作者
Stone, Vicki [1 ]
Johnston, Helinor [1 ]
Schins, Roel P. F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Life Sci, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, IUF Inst Umweltmed Forsch, Dusseldorf, Germany
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Nanoparticles; protocols; in vitro; cytotoxicity; genotoxicity; inflammation; WALLED CARBON NANOTUBES; LUNG EPITHELIAL-CELLS; INCREASED PULMONARY TOXICITY; OXIDATIVE DNA-DAMAGE; ULTRAFINE PARTICLES; SURFACE-AREA; RAT LUNG; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; INHALED PARTICLES; AMOSITE ASBESTOS;
D O I
10.1080/10408440903120975
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
Due to the rapid development of a diverse array of nanoparticles, used in a wide variety of products, there are now many international activities to assess the potential toxicity of these materials. These particles are developed due to properties such as catalytic reactivity, high surface area, light emission properties, and others. Such properties have the potential to interfere in many well-established toxicity testing protocols. This article outlines some of the most frequently used assays to assess the cytotoxity and biological reactivity of nanoparticles in vitro. The article identifies key issues that need to be addressed in relation to inclusion of relevant controls, assessing particles for their ability to interfere in the assays, and using systematic approaches to prevent misinterpretation of data. The protocols discussed range from simple cytotoxicity assays, to measurement of reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress, activation of proinflammatory signaling, and finally genotoxicity. The aim of this review is to share knowledge relating to nanoparticle toxicity testing in order to provide advice and support for guidelines, regulatory bodies, and for scientists in general.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 626
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] At the Crossroads of Nanotoxicology in vitro: Past Achievements and Current Challenges
    Hussain, Saber M.
    Warheit, David B.
    Ng, Sheung P.
    Comfort, Kristen K.
    Grabinski, Christin M.
    Braydich-Stolle, Laura K.
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 147 (01) : 5 - 16
  • [32] Response to Methodological Considerations
    Trivedi, Usha
    Maldjian, Pierre
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (02) : 751 - 751
  • [33] Methodological and experimental considerations
    Delgado, Mauricio R.
    Beer, Jennifer S.
    Fellows, Lesley K.
    Huettel, Scott A.
    Platt, Michael L.
    Quirk, Gregory J.
    Schiller, Daniela
    NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 19 (12) : 1549 - 1550
  • [34] METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN GRADING
    FRISBIE, DA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE TEACHERS OF AGRICULTURE JOURNAL, 1978, 22 (01): : 30 - 34
  • [35] Methodological considerations on "teleanalysis"
    Hardt, Juergen
    PSYCHE-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOANALYSE UND IHRE ANWENDUNGEN, 2018, 72 (08) : 666 - 675
  • [36] Indigenous Peoples' food systems, nutrition, and gender: Conceptual and methodological considerations
    Lemke, Stefanie
    Delormier, Treena
    MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION, 2017, 13
  • [37] Evaluating systems for delivering legal services to the poor: Conceptual and methodological considerations
    Van Ryzin, GG
    Lado, ME
    FORDHAM LAW REVIEW, 1999, 67 (05) : 2553 - 2571
  • [38] DECISION BEHAVIOR IN URBAN-DEVELOPMENT - A METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH AND SUBSTANTIVE CONSIDERATIONS
    HOGARTH, RM
    MICHAUD, C
    MERY, JL
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1980, 45 (1-3) : 95 - 117
  • [39] Dynamical Systems: An Effective Way in Nanotoxicology Study
    Han, Yu
    Xu, Xiaoming
    Yin, Longping
    Long, Ling
    Liu, Rui
    Liu, Shiyuan
    JOURNAL OF ALGORITHMS & COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 5 (01) : 79 - 93
  • [40] Scenario development in transport studies: Methodological considerations and reflections on delphi studies
    Melander, Lisa
    FUTURES, 2018, 96 : 68 - 78