Using optimal control methods with constraints to generate singlet states in NMR

被引:21
|
作者
Rodin, Bogdan A. [1 ,2 ]
Kiryutin, Alexey S. [1 ,2 ]
Yurkovskaya, Alexandra V. [1 ,2 ]
Ivanov, Konstantin L. [1 ,2 ]
Yamamoto, Satoru [3 ]
Sato, Kazunobu [3 ]
Takui, Takeji [3 ]
机构
[1] RAS, SB, Int Tomog Ctr, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
[2] Novosibirsk State Univ, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
[3] Osaka City Univ, Grad Sch Sci, Sumiyoshi Ku, Osaka 5588585, Japan
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
Spin relaxation; Long-lived states; Singlet-state NMR; Adiabatic passage; Optimal control theory; BROAD-BAND EXCITATION; LONG-LIVED STATES; SPIN STATES; DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENTS; SLOW DIFFUSION; INVERSION; LIMITS; ORDER; SPECTROSCOPY; MOLECULES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmr.2018.03.005
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A method is proposed for optimizing the performance of the APSOC (Adiabatic-Passage Spin Order Conversion) technique, which can be exploited in NMR experiments with singlet spin states. In this technique magnetization-to-singlet conversion (and singlet-to-magnetization conversion) is performed by using adiabatically ramped RF-fields. Optimization utilizes the GRAPE (Gradient Ascent Pulse Engineering) approach, in which for a fixed search area we assume monotonicity to the envelope of the RF-field. Such an approach allows one to achieve much better performance for APSOC; consequently, the efficiency of magnetization-to-singlet conversion is greatly improved as compared to simple model RF-ramps, e.g., linear ramps. We also demonstrate that the optimization method is reasonably robust to possible inaccuracies in determining NMR parameters of the spin system under study and also in setting the RF-field parameters. The present approach can be exploited in other NMR and EPR applications using adiabatic switching of spin Hamiltomans. (c) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 22
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On convergence of regularization methods for nonlinear parabolic optimal control problems with control and state constraints
    Neitzel, Ira
    Troeltzsch, Fredi
    CONTROL AND CYBERNETICS, 2008, 37 (04): : 1013 - 1043
  • [22] Optimal control problem regularization for the Markov process with finite number of states and constraints
    B. M. Miller
    G. B. Miller
    K. V. Semenikhin
    Automation and Remote Control, 2016, 77 : 1589 - 1611
  • [23] Optimal control problem regularization for the Markov process with finite number of states and constraints
    Miller, B. M.
    Miller, G. B.
    Semenikhin, K. V.
    AUTOMATION AND REMOTE CONTROL, 2016, 77 (09) : 1589 - 1611
  • [24] On optimal control problems of a class of impulsive switching systems with terminal states constraints
    Gao, Rui
    Liu, Xinzhi
    Yang, Jinlin
    NONLINEAR ANALYSIS-THEORY METHODS & APPLICATIONS, 2010, 73 (07) : 1940 - 1951
  • [25] Using dynamic neural networks to generate chaos: An inverse optimal control approach
    Sanchez, EN
    Perez, JP
    Chen, GR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIFURCATION AND CHAOS, 2001, 11 (03): : 857 - 863
  • [26] Robust Generation of Logical Qubit Singlet States with Reverse Engineering and Optimal Control with Spin Qubits
    Kang, Yi-Hao
    Shi, Zhi-Cheng
    Xia, Yan
    Song, Jie
    ADVANCED QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 3 (12)
  • [27] Regulating the system constraints in optimal control using predictive regulator
    Dr. Nirmalya Chandra
    Discover Electronics, 1 (1):
  • [28] Semi-Smooth Newton Methods for Optimal Control of the Dynamical Lame System with Control Constraints
    Kroener, Axel
    NUMERICAL FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION, 2013, 34 (07) : 741 - 769
  • [29] Shooting Methods to Solve Optimal Control Problems with State and Mixed Control-State Constraints
    Karbowski, Andrzej
    CHALLENGES IN AUTOMATION, ROBOTICS AND MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2016, 440 : 189 - 205
  • [30] CERTIFIED REDUCED BASIS METHODS FOR PARAMETRIZED DISTRIBUTED ELLIPTIC OPTIMAL CONTROL PROBLEMS WITH CONTROL CONSTRAINTS
    Bader, Eduard
    Kaercher, Mark
    Grepl, Martin A.
    Veroy, Karen
    SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2016, 38 (06): : A3921 - A3946