Hip or spine surgery first? A SURVEY OF TREATMENT ORDER FOR PATIENTS WITH CONCURRENT DEGENERATIVE HIP AND SPINAL DISORDERS

被引:26
|
作者
Liu, N. [1 ,4 ]
Goodman, S. B. [2 ,4 ]
Lachiewicz, P. F. [3 ,6 ]
Wood, K. B. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Redwood City, CA USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Orthopaed Surg & Bioengn, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Redwood City, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Redwood City, CA USA
[4] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Orthopaed Surg, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Redwood City, CA 94063 USA
[6] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Durham, NC USA
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2019年 / 101B卷 / 06期
关键词
FUSION;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1073.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims Patients may present with concurrent symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine, with surgical treatment being indicated for both. Whether arthroplasty of the hip or spinal surgery should be performed first remains uncertain. Materials and Methods Clinical scenarios were devised for a survey asking the preferred order of surgery and the rationale for this decision for five fictional patients with both OA of the hip and degenerative lumbar disorders. These were symptomatic OA of the hip and: 1) lumbar spinal stenosis with neurological claudication; 2) lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with leg pain; 3) lumbar disc herniation with leg weakness; 4) lumbar scoliosis with back pain; and 5) thoracolumbar disc herniation with myelopathy. This survey was sent to 110 members of The Hip Society and 101 members of the Scoliosis Research Society. The choices of the surgeons were compared among scenarios and between surgical specialties using the chi-squared test. The free-text comments were analyzed using text-mining. Results Responses were received from 51 hip surgeons (46%) and 37 spine surgeons (37%). The percentages of hip surgeons recommending 'hip first' differed significantly among scenarios: 59% for scenario 1; 73% for scenario 2; 47% for scenario 3; 47% for scenario 4; and 10% for scenario 5 (p < 0.001). The percentages of spine surgeons recommending 'hip first' were 49% for scenario 1; 70% for scenario 2; 19% for scenario 3; 78% for scenario 4; and 0% for scenario 5. There were significant differences between the groups for scenarios 3 (more hip surgeons recommended 'hip first'; p = 0.012) and 4 (more hip surgeons recommended 'spine first'; p = 0.006). Conclusion In patients with coexistent OA of the hip and degenerative disorders of the spine, the question of 'hip or spinal surgery first' elicits relatively consistent answers in some clinical scenarios, but remains controversial in others, even for experienced surgeons. The nature of neurological symptoms can influence surgeons' decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 44
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Battle: Operationsindikation beim Hip-Spine-Syndrom – Die Hüfte oder die Wirbelsäule zuerst?Die Sicht des WirbelsäulenchirurgenBattle: Indication for surgery in hip-spine syndrome—Hip or spine first?The spine surgeon‘s view
    Wojciech Pepke
    Moritz M. Innmann
    Michael Akbar
    Der Orthopäde, 2020, 49 (10): : 905 - 912
  • [32] Population pharmacokinetics of cefuroxime and uptake into hip and spine bone of patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery
    Gergs, Ulrich
    Becker, Lina
    Okoniewski, Richard
    Weiss, Michael
    Delank, Karl-Stefan
    Neumann, Joachim
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 72 (03) : 364 - 370
  • [33] Battle: Operationsindikation beim Hip-Spine-Syndrom – Die Hüfte oder die Wirbelsäule zuerst?Die Sicht des EndoprothetikersBattle: Total hip arthroplasty or spine surgery first in patients with hip-spine-syndrome?The arthroplasty surgeon’s point of view
    M. Clarius
    M. Farweez
    M. M. Innmann
    Der Orthopäde, 2020, 49 : 899 - 904
  • [34] Haemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery
    Messina, A.
    Frassanito, L.
    Catalano, A.
    Castellana, A.
    Santoprete, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (01) : 241 - 242
  • [35] Hip-spine syndrome: cross-sectional-study of spinal alignment in patients with coxalgia
    Miyagi, Masayuki
    Fukushima, Kensuke
    Inoue, Gen
    Nakazawa, Toshiyuki
    Imura, Takayuki
    Saito, Wataru
    Takahira, Naonobu
    Takaso, Masashi
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 29 (01) : 21 - 25
  • [36] Complications in spinal surgery: comparative survey of spine surgeons and patients who underwent spinal surgery Clinical article
    Ratliff, John K.
    Lebude, Bryan
    Albert, Todd
    Anene-Maidoh, Tony
    Anderson, Greg
    Dagostino, Phillip
    Maltenfort, Mitchel
    Hilibrand, Alan
    Sharan, Ashwini
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2009, 10 (06) : 578 - 584
  • [37] VISCOSUPPLEMENTATION IS NOT AN ALTERNATIVE TO HIP JOINT SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS. RESULTS OF A "REAL LIFE" CLINICAL SURVEY IN 137 PATIENTS
    Conrozier, T.
    Walliser-Lohse, A.
    Balblanc, J-C.
    Bossert, M.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2014, 22 : S480 - S480
  • [38] Concurrent Treatment with Vitamin K2 and D3 on Spine Fusion in Patients with Osteoporosis-Associated Lumbar Degenerative Disorders
    Zhang, Wencan
    Li, Le
    Zhou, Xin
    Li, Kunpeng
    Liu, Chen
    Lin, Xiangyu
    Lubisi, Njabulo
    Chen, Junfei
    Si, Haipeng
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (04) : 352 - 360
  • [39] Uniform criteria for total hip replacement surgery in patients with hip osteoarthritis: a decision tool to guide treatment decisions
    Atsma, Femke
    Molenkamp, Olivier
    Bouma, Heinse
    Bolder, Stefan B.
    Groenewoud, A. Stef
    Westert, Gert P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2021, 33 (01)
  • [40] A Systematic Review of Treatment Strategies for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery in Patients With Osteoporosis
    Fischer, Charla R.
    Hanson, Gregory
    Eller, Melinda
    Lehman, Ronald A.
    GERIATRIC ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2016, 7 (04) : 188 - 196