Intermediate performance impacts of advanced manufacturing technology systems: An empirical investigation

被引:65
|
作者
Brandyberry, A [1 ]
Rai, A
White, GP
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Finance & Management Informat Sci, Duluth, MN 55812 USA
[2] Georgia State Univ, J Mack Robinson Coll Business, Elect Commerce Inst, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[3] So Illinois Univ, Coll Business & Adm, Dept Management, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb00916.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A large-scale random sample is used to empirically examine the relationships between implementation of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMT) and three organization-level measures that have historically been attributed to AMT, but not fully tested along the AMT spectrum: market-oriented flexibility of the production process, organizational integration of production processes, and administrative intensity of the organization. Results indicate that as an organization moves along the technology scale from stand-alone AMT (e.g., CNC machines) through functionally oriented AMT (FMS and CAM) toward CIM, not only do its production processes become more integrated with each other, but those processes become more integrated with other functional systems of the organization, and the quality and timeliness of production information increase. Furthermore, this relationship becomes stronger as companies increase their level of implementation for the latter two technologies. Conversely, market-oriented flexibility decreases and administrative intensity is not observed to change as companies move along the technology spectrum. Future research should examine how organizational redesign and implementation strategies that accompany AMT implementation can concomitantly enhance organizational integration of the production process and market-oriented flexibility.
引用
收藏
页码:993 / 1020
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    CALDECOTE, V
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 1984, 395 (1808): : 47 - 62
  • [42] Purchasing performance management systems: an empirical investigation
    Caniato, Federico
    Luzzini, Davide
    Ronchi, Stefano
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2014, 25 (07) : 616 - 635
  • [43] Firms using advanced, manufacturing technology management: An empirical analysis based on size
    Gupta, A.
    Whitehouse, F.R.
    [J]. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2001, 12 (05): : 346 - 350
  • [44] Supply chain integration, advanced manufacturing technology, and strategic leadership: An empirical study
    Birasnav, M.
    Bienstock, Joshua
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 130 : 142 - 157
  • [45] Implementation of advanced manufacturing technology in Pakistani small and medium enterprises An empirical analysis
    Marri, H. B.
    Gunasekaran, A.
    Sohag, R. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2007, 20 (06) : 726 - +
  • [46] Role of organizational commitment in advanced manufacturing technology and performance relationship
    Gupta, Atul
    Prinzinger, Joe
    Messerschmidt, Dan C.
    [J]. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 1998, 9 (5-6): : 272 - 278
  • [47] Effects of operational employee skills on advanced manufacturing technology performance
    Pagell, M
    Handfield, RB
    Barber, AE
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2000, 9 (03) : 222 - 238
  • [48] Effective factors on advanced manufacturing technology implementation performance: A review
    Saberi, S.
    Yusuff, R.M.
    Zulkifli, N.
    Megat Ahmad, M.M.H.
    [J]. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2010, 10 (13) : 1229 - 1242
  • [49] ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, WORK DESIGN, AND PERFORMANCE - A CHANGE STUDY
    WALL, TD
    CORBETT, JM
    MARTIN, R
    CLEGG, CW
    JACKSON, PR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 75 (06) : 691 - 697
  • [50] EXPERT SYSTEMS IN THE APPRAISAL OF INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    SWEENEY, ET
    [J]. FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-AIDED PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 1988, : 517 - 520