Cost-effectiveness analysis of gestational diabetes mellitus screening in France

被引:25
|
作者
Poncet, B
Touzet, S
Rocher, L
Berland, M
Orgiazzi, J
Colin, C
机构
[1] Hospices Civils Lyon, Unite Evaluat Med Econ, Dept Med Informat, LASS,UMR 5823,CNRS, F-69424 Lyon 03, France
[2] Ctr Hosp Lyon Sud, Serv Med Interne, Hospices Civils Lyon, F-69310 Pierre Benite, France
[3] Ctr Hosp Lyon Sud, Serv Gynecol Obstet, Hospices Civils Lyon, F-69310 Pierre Benite, France
关键词
cost-effectiveness of gestational diabetes screening; decision analysis model;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00042-8
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare three strategies for gestational diabetes screening (i) screening of high-risk pregnant women with the 50g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT): (ii) screening of all pregnant women with the 50 OGTT (iii) screening of all pregnant women according to the 75 g OGTT. Study design: Cost-effectiveness analysis. The outcome measures, i.e. macrosonita, prematurity, perinatal mortality, hypertensive disorders rates were estimated from published studies and the costs from a prospective study inolving 120 pregnant women. Results: Compared to the first strategy, the cost to obtain one unit of additional effectiveness with the second screening strategy. was up to I times more expensive. and with the third strategy was up to 3.7 times more expensive. Conclusion: The cost,, per case prevented reflect a favourable cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) for screening of high-risk pregnant women by 50 oral glucose test. (C) 2002 ELsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 129
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The cost of universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in Ireland
    Gillespie, P.
    O'Neill, C.
    Avalos, G.
    O'Reilly, M.
    Dunne, F.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2011, 28 (08) : 912 - 918
  • [32] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF HOME HAEMODIALYSIS FOR DIABETES MELLITUS POPULATION IN TAIWAN
    Hsu, J. C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A191 - A191
  • [33] Cost-effectiveness of a mobile health-supported lifestyle intervention for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus
    O'Sullivan, Elizabeth J.
    Kennelly, Maria A.
    Rokicki, Slawa
    Ainscough, Kate
    McAuliffe, Fionnuala M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S380 - S381
  • [34] What determines the cost-effectiveness of diabetes screening?
    C. Glümer
    M. Yuyun
    S. Griffin
    D. Farewell
    D. Spiegelhalter
    A. L. Kinmonth
    N. J. Wareham
    Diabetologia, 2006, 49 : 1536 - 1544
  • [35] The cost-effectiveness of screening for type 2 diabetes
    Engelgau, MM
    Narayan, KMV
    Thompson, TJ
    Boyle, JP
    Williamson, DF
    Manninen, DL
    Dong, FB
    Orians, CE
    Dasbach, EJ
    Teutsch, SM
    Eastman, R
    Herman, WH
    Songer, TJ
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (20): : 1757 - 1763
  • [36] What determines the cost-effectiveness of diabetes screening?
    Glumer, C.
    Yuyun, M.
    Griffin, S.
    Farewell, D.
    Spiegelhalter, D.
    Kinmonth, A. L.
    Wareham, N. J.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2006, 49 (07) : 1536 - 1544
  • [37] Universal fetal echocardiography for pre-gestational diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Savitsky, Leah M.
    Albright, Catherine M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S49 - S49
  • [38] Cost-effectiveness analysis of two strategies for mass screening for colorectal cancer in France
    Berchi, C
    Bouvier, V
    Réaud, JM
    Launoy, G
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (03) : 227 - 238
  • [39] Cost-effectiveness of gestational diabetes screening including prevention of type 2 diabetes: application of the GeDiForCE model in Australia
    Beilby, Hannah
    Yang, Fan
    Gannon, Brenda
    McIntyre, Harold David
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (25): : 8286 - 8293
  • [40] Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for GDM
    Van Leeuwen, Marsha
    Vijgen, Sylvia
    Opmeer, Brent C.
    Evers, Inge
    Mol, Ben Willem
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S109 - S109