Alternative Approaches to Comparative nth-Degree Risk Aversion

被引:9
|
作者
Liu, Liqun [1 ]
Neilson, William S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Private Enterprise Res Ctr, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Econ, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
risk aversion; comparative risk aversion; risk premium; probability premium; downside risk aversion; COMPARATIVE STATICS; STRONGER MEASURES; UTILITY PREMIUM; SELF-PROTECTION; PRUDENCE; UNCERTAINTY; INCREASES; ATTITUDES; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2018.3119
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper extends the three main approaches to comparative risk aversion-the risk premium approach and the probability premium approach of Pratt (1964) [Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1-2):122-136] and the comparative statics approach of Jindapon and Neilson (2007) [Higher-order generalizations of Arrow-Pratt and Ross risk aversion: A comparative statics approach. J. Econom. Theory 136(1):719-728]-to study comparative nth-degree risk aversion. These extensions can accommodate trading off an nth-degree risk increase and an nth-degree risk increase for any m, such that 1 <= m < n. It goes on to show that, in the expected utility framework, all of these general notions of comparative nth-degree risk aversion are equivalent and can be characterized by the concept of (n/m)th-degree Ross more risk aversion of Liu and Meyer (2013) [Substituting one risk increase for another: A method for measuring risk aversion.
引用
收藏
页码:3824 / 3834
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条