Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements between Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Ultrasound Pachymetry

被引:2
|
作者
Ohn, Kyoung [1 ]
Lee, Mee Yon [1 ]
Lee, Young Chun [1 ]
Shin, Hye Young [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Uijeongbu St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Uijongbu, South Korea
来源
关键词
Central corneal thickness; Endothelial cell density; Noncontact specular microscopy; Ultrasound pachymetry; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; ENDOTHELIAL DAMAGE; TOPCON SP-3000P; SCANNING-SLIT; AGE; POPULATION; TONOMETRY; GLAUCOMA; DENSITY; DEVICES;
D O I
10.3341/jkos.2019.60.7.635
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: We compared and analyzed central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements according to the corneal thickness obtained with noncontact specular microscopy (NCSM) and ultrasound pachymetry (USP). Methods: CCT was measured in the order of NCSM and USP by a single optometrist in 120 eyes of 120 healthy subjects. The measurements were compared between the devices and the measurement agreements and correlations between the devices were analyzed. To determine if the measurements differed depending on the thickness of the cornea, the patients were divided into three tertile groups from the thinnest patient by CCT measurement using USP, and then the differences in CCT measured by the two devices were analyzed. Results: The CCT measurements using NCSM and USP were 548.25 +/- 4.64 mu m and 533.09 +/- 35.96 mu m, respectively. NCSM measurements were found to be thicker, showing statistically significant differences between the measurements (p < 0.001). The two examinations showed a high degree of correlation (r = 0.878; p < 0.01). In the three groups, the differences in CCT measurements between NCSM and USP were 12.93 +/- 21.88 mu m, 16.85 +/- 15.89 mu m, and 15.70 +/- 20.46 mu m, respectively, but the differences between the three groups were not statistically significant (p = 0.655). Conclusions: Our results show that although the differences in CCT measurements using NCSM and USP were consistent regardless of the corneal thickness, the CCT measurements by NCSM and USP were highly correlated.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 642
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of central corneal thickness in corneal edema by ultrasound pachymetry, specular microscopy, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography
    Artuc, Tuncay
    Batur, Muhammed
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 37 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [12] Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes:: Pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry
    Ucakhan, Oemur Oezlenen
    Oezkan, Muhip
    Kanpolat, Ayfer
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 32 (06): : 970 - 977
  • [13] Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymetry and optical coherence tomography
    Leung, Dexter Y. L.
    Lam, Douglas K. T.
    Yeung, Barry Y. M.
    Lam, Dennis S. C.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 34 (08): : 751 - 754
  • [14] Agreement between Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Pentacam Scheimpflug Camera, Noncontact Specular Microscopy, and Ultrasonographic Pachymetry in Diabetic Patients
    Altay, Yesim
    Balta, Ozgur
    Demirok, Gulizar
    Burcu, Ayse
    Balta, Oyku Bezen
    Ornek, Firdevs
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2017, 42 (02) : 187 - 194
  • [15] Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II scanning slit topography, noncontact specular microscopy, and ultrasonic pachymetry in eyes with keratoconus
    Kawana, K
    Miyata, K
    Tokunaga, T
    Kiuchi, T
    Hiraoka, T
    Oshika, T
    CORNEA, 2005, 24 (08) : 967 - 971
  • [16] Comparison of central corneal thickness as measured by non-contact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry before and post LASIK
    Zhao, Ming-Hui
    Zou, Jun
    Wang, Wen-Qing
    Li, Jun
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 35 (09): : 818 - 823
  • [17] Comparison and Evaluation of Central Corneal Thickness Using 2 New Noncontact Specular Microscopes and Conventional Pachymetry Devices
    Bao, Fangjun
    Wang, Qinmei
    Cheng, Shiming
    Savini, Giacomo
    Lu, Weicong
    Feng, Yifan
    Yu, Ye
    Huang, Jinhai
    CORNEA, 2014, 33 (06) : 576 - 581
  • [18] Comparison of central corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry versus slit-lamp optical coherence tomography, specular microscopy, and Orbscan
    Khaja, Wassia A.
    Grover, Sandeep
    Kelmenson, Amy T.
    Ferguson, Lee R.
    Sambhav, Kumar
    Chalam, Kakarla V.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 9 : 1065 - 1070
  • [19] Central corneal thickness measurements in normal dogs: a comparison between ultrasound pachymetry and optical coherence tomography
    Alario, Anthony F.
    Pirie, Christopher G.
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 17 (03) : 207 - 211
  • [20] Comparison Between Laser Scanning In Vivo Confocal Microscopy and Noncontact Specular Microscopy in Assessing Corneal Endothelial Cell Density and Central Corneal Thickness
    Salvetat, Maria Letizia
    Zeppieri, Marco
    Miani, Flavia
    Parisi, Lucia
    Felletti, Mirella
    Brusini, Paolo
    CORNEA, 2011, 30 (07) : 754 - 759