The Three-Story Challenge: Implications of the Next Generation Science Standards for Teacher Preparation

被引:45
|
作者
Windschitl, Mark A. [1 ]
Stroupe, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sci Teaching & Learning, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
science teacher education; science education; standards; equity; reform; SCHOOL SCIENCE; DRIVEN INQUIRY; ARGUMENT; LEARN; EXPLANATION; RESOURCES; EDUCATORS; CLASSROOM; COGNITION; FUNDS;
D O I
10.1177/0022487117696278
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The foundational document of the current science standards movementthe Framework for K-12 Science Educationis grounded in research about how students from diverse backgrounds learn science and the conditions under which they can participate in knowledge-building activities of the discipline. We argue that teacher educators should use powerful principles for instruction, derived from the research referenced in the Framework, to inform the design of courses and other preparatory experiences for novices. This implementation strategy contrasts with an alignment approach, in which novices would be asked to familiarize themselves with the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), integrate student performance expectations into lesson plans, and teach activities similar to those described in the NGSS. We describe the more principled approach as a three-story challenge in which students, teachers, and teacher educators have responsibilities to learn and to take up new roles in the educational system that are fundamentally different from the status quo.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 261
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Teacher Perceptions of Their Curricular and Pedagogical Shifts: Outcomes of a Project-Based Model of Teacher Professional Development in the Next Generation Science Standards
    Shernoff, David J.
    Sinha, Suparna
    Bressler, Denise M.
    Schultz, Dawna
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [32] National science education standards: Implications for the chemistry teacher.
    Ware, SA
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1996, 211 : 589 - CHED
  • [33] Disciplinary Literacy Through the Lens of the Next Generation Science Standards
    Houseal, Ana
    Gillis, Victoria
    Helmsing, Mark
    Hutchison, Linda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT & ADULT LITERACY, 2016, 59 (04) : 377 - 384
  • [34] Teacher Leader Model Standards: Implications for Preparation, Policy, and Practice
    Berg, Jill Harrison
    Carver, Cynthia L.
    Mangin, Melinda M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON LEADERSHIP EDUCATION, 2014, 9 (02): : 195 - 217
  • [35] A content analysis of alignment messages to the Next Generation Science Standards
    Jamie Tanas
    Gavin Fulmer
    [J]. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 5 (1)
  • [36] Science and Language for English Language Learners in Relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with Implications for Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics
    Lee, Okhee
    Quinn, Helen
    Valdes, Guadalupe
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2013, 42 (04) : 223 - 233
  • [37] The Next Generation Science Standards: A potential revolution for geoscience education
    Wysession, Michael E.
    [J]. EARTHS FUTURE, 2014, 2 (05) : 299 - 302
  • [38] The Next Generation Science Standards: How Many Dimensions of Learning Are There?
    McComas, William F.
    [J]. AMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER, 2016, 78 (09): : 707 - 707
  • [39] Planning Instruction to Meet the Intent of the Next Generation Science Standards
    Krajcik, Joseph
    Codere, Susan
    Dahsah, Chanyah
    Bayer, Renee
    Mun, Kongju
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION, 2014, 25 (02) : 157 - 175
  • [40] Connecting Current Research to the Next Generation Science Standards.
    Osheroff, H.
    Yu, K. R.
    [J]. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2018, 29 (26)