Rules, Prudence and Public Value: Public Servants and Social Media in Comparative Perspective

被引:12
|
作者
Grube, Dennis C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Inst Study Social Change, Hobart, Tas, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
ONLINE; ACCOUNTABILITY; GOVERNMENT; ENGAGEMENT; LIMITS;
D O I
10.1017/gov.2015.21
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The reach of social media is prodigious. Its ubiquitous nature has reshaped the ways in which government agencies can communicate with citizens. But amidst the rush to embrace the opportunities of Twitter, Facebook and other platforms, governments have had to lay down rules to govern how and when public service departments should use social media. This article undertakes a comparative analysis of the formal rules and guidelines in place across four Westminster jurisdictions - Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the UK - to identify the types of behaviours and activities that are seen as desirable when public servants are reaching out to the wider public through social media. The article argues that the horizontal communication patterns associated with social media are fundamentally at odds with the hierarchical structures of the Westminster system of government.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 99
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Public Value of Social Media in the UK Public Sector
    Osmani, Mohamad W.
    Weerakkody, Vishanth
    Sivarajah, Uthayasankar
    El-Haddadeh, Ramzi
    [J]. ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT AND ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION, 2014, 21 : 276 - 286
  • [2] Prudence or outrage? Public opinion and humanitarian intervention in historical and comparative perspective
    Western, Jon
    [J]. Emergence of Humanitarian Intervention: Ideas and Practice from the Nineteenth Century to the Present, 2016, : 165 - 184
  • [3] Social Media and Suicide: A Public Health Perspective
    Luxton, David D.
    June, Jennifer D.
    Fairall, Jonathan M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 102 : S195 - S200
  • [4] Social media as public sphere: a stakeholder perspective
    Johannessen, Marius Rohde
    Saebo, Oystein
    Flak, Leif Skiftenes
    [J]. TRANSFORMING GOVERNMENT- PEOPLE PROCESS AND POLICY, 2016, 10 (02) : 212 - 238
  • [5] A State without Civil Servants: Japan's Public Sector in Comparative Perspective
    Sunahara, Yosuke
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE JAPAN JOURNAL, 2018, 21 (01) : 141 - 144
  • [6] EUROPEAN PUBLIC BROADCASTERS INTERACTION AND SOCIAL MEDIA POLICY TO PUBLIC VALUE MANAGEMENT
    Tunez-Lopez, Miguel
    Costa-Sanchez, Carmen
    [J]. PRISMA SOCIAL, 2018, (22): : 61 - 90
  • [7] Social Media Risks and Benefits: A Public Sector Perspective
    Khan, Gohar Feroz
    Swar, Bobby
    Lee, Sang Kon
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2014, 32 (05) : 606 - 627
  • [8] Environmental disaster and public rescue: A social media perspective
    Li, Lei
    Du, Yufei
    Ma, Shaojun
    Ma, Xiaoyu
    Zheng, Yilin
    Han, Xu
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 100
  • [9] Public Social Media Services: A Citizen's Perspective
    Wirtz, Bernd W.
    Langer, Paul F.
    Goettel, Vincent
    Thomas, Marc-Julian
    [J]. PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 43 (06) : 1342 - 1358
  • [10] The Transformation of the Public Sphere, Media Technology and the Media/Social Ecology Perspective
    Leaning, Marcus
    [J]. GLOBALIZATION AND CHANGING PATTERNS IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE, 2010, : 83 - 90