Analysis of cluster randomised stepped wedge trials with repeated cross-sectional samples

被引:98
|
作者
Hemming, Karla [1 ]
Taljaard, Monica [2 ,3 ]
Forbes, Andrew [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Ottawa Hosp, Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Dept Epidemiol & Community Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Stepped wedge; Cluster randomised trial; Analysis; Secular trends; SIZE CALCULATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-017-1833-7
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial (SW-CRT) is increasingly being used to evaluate policy or service delivery interventions. However, there is a dearth of trials literature addressing analytical approaches to the SW-CRT. Perhaps as a result, a significant number of published trials have major methodological shortcomings, including failure to adjust for secular trends at the analysis stage. Furthermore, the commonly used analytical framework proposed by Hussey and Hughes makes several assumptions. Methods: We highlight the assumptions implicit in the basic SW-CRT analytical model proposed by Hussey and Hughes. We consider how simple modifications of the basic model, using both random and fixed effects, can be used to accommodate deviations from the underlying assumptions. We consider the implications of these modifications for the intracluster correlation coefficients. In a case study, the importance of adjusting for the secular trend is illustrated. Results: The basic SW-CRT model includes a fixed effect for time, implying a common underlying secular trend across steps and clusters. It also includes a single term for treatment, implying a constant shift in this trend under the treatment. When these assumptions are not realistic, simple modifications can be implemented to allow the secular trend to vary across clusters and the treatment effect to vary across clusters or time. In our case study, the naive treatment effect estimate (adjusted for clustering but unadjusted for time) suggests a beneficial effect. However, after adjusting for the underlying secular trend, we demonstrate a reversal of the treatment effect. Conclusion: Due to the inherent confounding of the treatment effect with time, analysis of a SW-CRT should always account for secular trends or risk-biased estimates of the treatment effect. Furthermore, the basic model proposed by Hussey and Hughes makes a number of important assumptions. Consideration needs to be given to the appropriate model choice at the analysis stage. We provide a Stata code to implement the proposed analyses in the illustrative case study.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of cluster randomised stepped wedge trials with repeated cross-sectional samples
    Karla Hemming
    Monica Taljaard
    Andrew Forbes
    [J]. Trials, 18
  • [2] Analysis of the cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trial
    Hemming, Karla
    Taljaard, Monica
    Forbes, Andrew
    [J]. TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [3] The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
    Martin, James Thomas
    Hemming, Karla
    Girling, Alan
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [4] The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
    James Thomas Martin
    Karla Hemming
    Alan Girling
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19
  • [5] Power calculation for cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes
    Harrison, Linda J.
    Chen, Tom
    Wang, Rui
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2020, 76 (03) : 951 - 962
  • [6] An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome
    Kristunas, Caroline A.
    Smith, Karen L.
    Gray, Laura J.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [7] An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome
    Caroline A. Kristunas
    Karen L. Smith
    Laura J. Gray
    [J]. Trials, 18
  • [8] Analysis of cluster randomized trials with repeated cross-sectional binary measurements
    Ukoumunne, OC
    Thompson, SG
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (03) : 417 - 433
  • [9] Minimum number of clusters and comparison of analysis methods for cross sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with binary outcomes: A simulation study
    Barker, Daniel
    D'Este, Catherine
    Campbell, Michael J.
    McElduff, Patrick
    [J]. TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [10] Minimum number of clusters and comparison of analysis methods for cross sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with binary outcomes: A simulation study
    Daniel Barker
    Catherine D’Este
    Michael J. Campbell
    Patrick McElduff
    [J]. Trials, 18