Length of legal proceedings and the pilot judgment procedure of the European Court of Human Rights: new challenges and problems

被引：0

作者：

Oganesian, Tigran D. ^{[1
]}

Markhgeym, Marina, V ^{[2
]}

Novikova, Alevtina E. ^{[2
]}

Safronova, Elena, V ^{[2
]}

Tonkov, Evgeniy E.

机构：

[1] Russian Foreign Minist, Int Dept, Diplomat Acad, 53-2 Ostozhenka, Moscow 11902, Russia

[2] Belgorod Natl Res Univ, Dept Constitut & Int Law, Belgorod, Russia

来源：

REVISTA SAN GREGORIO | 2020年 / 42期

关键词：

European Court of Human Rights; pilot judgment procedure; structural (systemic) problems; general measures; reasonable time; length of proceeding;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ;

摘要：

The article examines issues related to the impact of the pilot judgment procedure of the ECtHR on the problems of excessive length of legal proceedings in national legal systems. A brief overview of some of the pilot judgments adopted in relation to Respondent States is provided, and an assessment of the effectiveness of the general measures taken is given. Conclusions are drawn about the criteria for determining reasonable terms of legal proceedings in the practice of the ECtHR. As recommendations, a number of measures are proposed that will help states eliminate the excessive length of legal proceedings.

引用

页码：293 / 304

页数：12

共 50 条

[21] Jurisprudence of the European court of human rights in the choice of precautionary measures in criminal proceedings: legal realities and perspectives
Romantsova, Svitlana
Zinkovskyy, Igor
Komisarchuk, Ruslan
Balatska, Olha
Strelbitska, Lesia
[J]. CUESTIONES POLITICAS, 2020, 38 (67): : 443 - 458
[22] LEGAL GROUNDS FOR RESTRICTIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CASE-LAW
Koruts, Uliana
Maksymovych, Roman
Shtykun, Olha
[J]. ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN EASTERN EUROPE, 2021, (04) : 131 - 145
[23] Actual challenges for the implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Jaskiernia, Jerzy
[J]. REVIEW OF EUROPEAN AND COMPARATIVE LAW, 2022, 48 (01): : 103 - 131
[24] The European Court of human rights: the progress made, the challenges of tomorrow
Tulkens, Francoise
[J]. CAHIERS DE DROIT, 2012, 53 (02): : 419 - 445
[25] THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE PROCEDURE OF ARTICLE 46.4 TO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM (REGARDING THE JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE CASE OF ILGAR MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN, 2019)
Rubio Fernandez, Eva Maria
[J]. REVISTA ELECTRONICA DE ESTUDIOS INTERNACIONALES, 2019, (38):
[26] Interpretation of Fundamental Rights in a Multilevel Legal System. An Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union
Forowicz, Magdalena
[J]. COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 2013, 50 (01): : 286 - 289
[27] Gloss to the Judgment of European Court of Human Rights of April 24, 2007 r
Zbrojewska, Monika
[J]. PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2008, (02): : 260 - 268
[28] European Court of Human Rights judgment on exhaustion of domestic remedies for property deprivations
Solomou, Alexia
[J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2010, 104 (04) : 628 - 636
[29] Legal Concept of Hate Speech and Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
Alaburic, Vesna
[J]. POLITICKA MISAO-CROATIAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2018, 55 (04): : 230 - 252
[30] Legal gender recognition in times of change at the European Court of Human Rights
Holzer L.
[J]. ERA Forum, 2022, 23 (2) : 165 - 182

← 1 2 3 4 5 →