Length of legal proceedings and the pilot judgment procedure of the European Court of Human Rights: new challenges and problems

被引：0

作者：

Oganesian, Tigran D. ^{[1
]}

Markhgeym, Marina, V ^{[2
]}

Novikova, Alevtina E. ^{[2
]}

Safronova, Elena, V ^{[2
]}

Tonkov, Evgeniy E.

机构：

[1] Russian Foreign Minist, Int Dept, Diplomat Acad, 53-2 Ostozhenka, Moscow 11902, Russia

[2] Belgorod Natl Res Univ, Dept Constitut & Int Law, Belgorod, Russia

来源：

REVISTA SAN GREGORIO | 2020年 / 42期

关键词：

European Court of Human Rights; pilot judgment procedure; structural (systemic) problems; general measures; reasonable time; length of proceeding;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ;

摘要：

The article examines issues related to the impact of the pilot judgment procedure of the ECtHR on the problems of excessive length of legal proceedings in national legal systems. A brief overview of some of the pilot judgments adopted in relation to Respondent States is provided, and an assessment of the effectiveness of the general measures taken is given. Conclusions are drawn about the criteria for determining reasonable terms of legal proceedings in the practice of the ECtHR. As recommendations, a number of measures are proposed that will help states eliminate the excessive length of legal proceedings.

引用

页码：293 / 304

页数：12

共 50 条

[1] THE PROCEDURE OF THE PILOT JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AS A MEANS OF NATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEMS TRANSFORMATION
Oganesyan, Tigran D.
[J]. TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, 2018, (429): : 221 - 226
[2] The Pilot Judgment Procedure of the European Court of Human Rights: The Search for the Necessary Balance
Oganesian, Tigran D.
[J]. TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, 2021, (465): : 227 - 234
[3] THE FUNCTIONING OF THE PILOT-JUDGMENT PROCEDURE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN PRACTICE
Glas, Lize R.
[J]. NETHERLANDS QUARTERLY OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 2016, 34 (01) : 41 - 70
[4] Human Rights Class Actions: Rethinking the Pilot-Judgment Procedure at the European Court of Human Rights
Sainati, Tatiana
[J]. HARVARD INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (01) : 147 - 205
[5] Resumption of court proceedings following the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
Bzdyn, Agata
Rajska, Dagmara
Ryngielewicz, Klaudiusz
[J]. PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2015, (02): : 206 - 222
[6] Flying or landing? The pilot judgment procedure in the changing European human rights architecture
Buyse, Antoine
[J]. SHIFTING CENTRES OF GRAVITY IN HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION: RETHINKING RELATIONS BETWEEN THE ECHR, EU, AND NATIONAL LEGAL ORDERS, 2016, : 101 - 115
[7] Forsaking Individual Justice: The Implications of the European Court of Human Rights' Pilot Judgment Procedure for Victims of Gross and Systematic Violations
Kurban, Dilek
[J]. HUMAN RIGHTS LAW REVIEW, 2016, 16 (04) : 731 - 769
[8] The European Court of human rights and the pilot-judgment approach: a minor revolution is on in Strasbourg
Lambert Abdelgawad, Elisabeth
[J]. REVISTA DE DERECHO POLITICO, 2007, (69): : 355 - 383
[9] THE LEGAL CULTURE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Kuehn, Zdenek
[J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW, 2010, 58 (01): : 205 - 209
[10] The Legal Culture of the European Court of Human Rights
Nelken, David
[J]. EUROPEAN PUBLIC LAW, 2009, 15 (03): : 447 - 456

← 1 2 3 4 5 →