Evaluation of Penalized Maximum-Likelihood PET Image Reconstruction for ROI Quantification

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, Li [1 ]
Zhou, Jian [1 ]
Asma, Evren [1 ]
Wang, Wenli [1 ]
机构
[1] Toshiba Med Res Inst USA Inc, Vernon Hills, IL USA
来源
2016 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM, MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE AND ROOM-TEMPERATURE SEMICONDUCTOR DETECTOR WORKSHOP (NSS/MIC/RTSD) | 2016年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Region of interest (ROI) quantification is one of the important tasks in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Statistical reconstruction methods based on the penalized maximum-likelihood (PML) principle have been developed to improve image quality over early stopping with EM-based methods and analytic methods. The penalty function that controls spatial smoothness plays an important role in PML reconstruction. The commonly used quadratic penalty often oversmooths sharp edges, while the edge-preserving penalty functions produce sharp intensity transitions across boundaries at the expense of potential image blockiness. Such blocky images limit the clinical widespread use of edge-prserving penalties. Recently patch-based edge-preserving penalties have been proposed for the purpose of preserving sharp edges and ensuring local smoothness while reducing image blockiness at the same time. The benefits of these penalty functions on clinical tasks had not been fully examined. In this work, we analyzed the ROI quantification performance for pairwise and patch-based penalties and also compared them with the standard ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstructions. We acquired a standard NEMA phantom scan and multiple whole-body patient scans with real lesions and also inserted lesions into the whole-body scans. The hot and cold sphere contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) versus the background variability was used to evaluate performance on the NEMA phantom. Mean lesion standardized uptake value (SUV) versus liver background variability was used for quantifying patient data. The results showed that the patch-based edge-preserving penalty achieved better quantification performance compared to other pairwise penalties and conventional OSEM.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Penalized maximum-likelihood reconstruction for improving limited-angle artifacts in a dedicated head and neck PET system
    Zhang, Hengquan
    Wang, Yuli
    Qi, Jinyi
    Abbaszadeh, Shiva
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (16):
  • [22] Evaluation and optimization of the maximum-likelihood approach for image reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis
    Jerebko, Anna K.
    Mertelmeier, Thomas
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2010, 7622
  • [23] A new fuzzy penalized likelihood method for PET image reconstruction
    Zhou, J
    Shu, HZ
    Luo, LM
    Zhu, HQ
    COMPUTATIONAL AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3314 : 550 - 555
  • [24] Penalized Maximum-Likelihood Depth Image Reconstruction Based on Peak-Picking for Gm-APD LiDAR
    Chang, Jiying
    Wang, Yuye
    Xu, Degang
    Li, Zhiting
    Li, Jining
    Yao, Jianquan
    2021 46TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFRARED, MILLIMETER AND TERAHERTZ WAVES (IRMMW-THZ), 2021,
  • [25] FAST MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD RECONSTRUCTION
    MILLER, TR
    WALLIS, JW
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1992, 33 (09) : 1710 - 1711
  • [26] A Line Process Approach to Penalized Maximum-Likelihood Reconstruction for 3D SPECT
    Arrowood, Lloyd
    Lee, Sanghyeb
    Gregor, Jens
    2013 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2013,
  • [27] Maximum-likelihood transmission image reconstruction for overlapping transmission beams
    Yu, DF
    Fessler, JA
    Ficaro, EP
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 19 (11) : 1094 - 1105
  • [28] Maximum-likelihood dual-energy tomographic image reconstruction
    Fessler, JA
    Elbakri, I
    Sukovic, P
    Clinthorne, NH
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2002: IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL 1-3, 2002, 4684 : 38 - 49
  • [29] ESTIMATION OF THE DURATION MODEL BY NONPARAMETRIC MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD, MAXIMUM PENALIZED LIKELIHOOD, AND PROBABILITY SIMULATORS
    HUH, K
    SICKLES, RC
    REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1994, 76 (04) : 683 - 694
  • [30] Maximum-likelihood image matching
    Olson, CF
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 24 (06) : 853 - 857