Biogas to liquefied biomethane via cryogenic upgrading technologies

被引:77
|
作者
Pellegrini, Laura Annamaria [1 ]
De Guido, Giorgia [1 ]
Lange, Stefano [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Chim Mat & Ingn Chim Giulio Natta, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Biogas upgrading; Biomethane; Low-temperature; Distillation; MEA; Energy saving; GAS; PURIFICATION; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2017.08.007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Liquid biomethane (LBM), also referred to as liquid biogas (LBG), is a promising biofuel for transport that can be obtained from upgrading and liquefaction of biogas. With respect to fossil fuels, LBM is a renewable resource, it can be produced almost everywhere, and it is a carbon neutral fuel. LBM is 3 times more energy dense than compressed biomethane (CBM) and it allows longer vehicle autonomy. LBM has also a higher energy density than other transport biofuels, it is produced from wastes and recycled material without being in competition with food production, and it assures a high final energy/primary energy ratio. The low temperatures at which LBM is obtained strongly suggest the use of cryogenic/low-temperature technologies also for biogas upgrading. In this respect, since biogas can be considered as a "particular" natural gas with a high CO2 content, the results available in the literature on natural gas purification can be taken into account, which prove that cryogenic/low-temperature technologies and, in particular, low-temperature distillation are less energy consuming when compared with traditional technologies, such as amine washing, for CO2 removal from natural gas streams at high CO2 content. Low-temperature purification processes allow the direct production of a biomethane stream at high purity and at low temperature, suitable conditions for the direct synergistic integration with biogas cryogenic liquefaction processes, while CO2 is obtained in liquid phase and under pressure. In this way, it can be easily pumped for transportation, avoiding significant compression costs as for classical CO2 capture units (where carbon dioxide is discharged in gas phase and at atmospheric pressure). In this paper, three natural gas low-temperature purification technologies have been modelled and their performances have been evaluated through an energy consumption analysis and a comparison with the amine washing process in terms of the equivalent amount of methane required for the upgrading, proving the profitability of cryogenic/low-temperature technologies. Specifically, the Ryan-Holmes, the dual pressure low-temperature distillation process and the anti-sublimation process have been considered. It has been found that the dual pressure low-temperature distillation scheme reaches the highest thermodynamic performances, resulting in the lowest equivalent methane requirement with respect to the other configurations. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 83
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biogas to biomethane upgrading by water absorption column at low pressure and temperature
    Pirola, Carlo
    Galli, Federico
    Bianchi, Claudia L.
    Manenti, Flavio
    TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 3 (2-3): : 99 - 103
  • [32] Alternative materials in technologies for Biogas upgrading via CO2 capture
    Zhou, Kui
    Chaemchuen, Somboon
    Verpoort, Francis
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 79 : 1414 - 1441
  • [33] Unlocking the potential of cryogenic biogas upgrading technologies integrated with bio-LNG production: A comparative assessment
    Naquash A.
    Agarwal N.
    Nizami M.
    Nga N.N.
    Aziz M.
    Lee M.
    Applied Energy, 2024, 371
  • [34] Renewable biomethane production from biogas upgrading via membrane separation: Experimental analysis and multistep configuration design
    Zito, Pasquale Francesco
    Brunetti, Adele
    Barbieri, Giuseppe
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 200 : 777 - 787
  • [35] A Review of Biogas Utilisation, Purification and Upgrading Technologies
    Olumide Wesley Awe
    Yaqian Zhao
    Ange Nzihou
    Doan Pham Minh
    Nathalie Lyczko
    Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2017, 8 : 267 - 283
  • [36] Life cycle assessment of biogas upgrading technologies
    Starr, Katherine
    Gabarrell, Xavier
    Villalba, Gara
    Talens, Laura
    Lombardi, Lidia
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (05) : 991 - 999
  • [37] A Review of Biogas Utilisation, Purification and Upgrading Technologies
    Awe, Olumide Wesley
    Zhao, Yaqian
    Nzihou, Ange
    Minh, Doan Pham
    Lyczko, Nathalie
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2017, 8 (02) : 267 - 283
  • [38] Biogas Production Systems and Upgrading Technologies: A Review
    Andlar, Martina
    Belskaya, Halina
    Morzak, Galina
    Santek, Mirela Ivancic
    Rezic, Tonci
    Tominac, Vlatka Petravic
    Santek, Bozidar
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 59 (04) : 387 - 412
  • [39] Membrane gas separation technologies for biogas upgrading
    Chen, Xiao Yuan
    Hoang Vinh-Thang
    Ramirez, Antonio Avalos
    Rodrigue, Denis
    Kaliaguine, Serge
    RSC ADVANCES, 2015, 5 (31) : 24399 - 24448
  • [40] Current Status of Biological Biogas Upgrading Technologies
    Lorant, Balint
    Tardy, Gabor Mark
    PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 66 (03) : 465 - 481