Prospective comparison of continuous femoral nerve block with nonstimulating catheter placement versus stimulating catheter-guided perineural placement in volunteers

被引:77
|
作者
Salinas, FV
Neal, JM
Sueda, LA
Kopacz, DJ
Liu, SS
机构
[1] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
continuous femoral nerve block; peripheral stimulating catheters; transcutaenous electrical stimulation;
D O I
10.1016/j.rapm.2004.02.009
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: Stimulating catheter-guided perineural placement may potentially increase the success rate and quality of continuous femoral nerve block as compared with a nonstimulating catheter technique. These hypotheses have not been rigorously tested. Methods: Twenty volunteers underwent placement of bilateral femoral nerve catheters in this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. For each side, a stimulating needle was advanced until quadriceps contractions were obtained at less than or equal to0.5 mA. On one side, a stimulating catheter was advanced 4 to 5 cm beyond the needle tip while eliciting quadriceps contractions via the catheter. If quadriceps contractions decreased or disappeared, the catheter position was adjusted until quadriceps contractions could be elicited at less than or equal to0.5 mA. On the contralateral side, an identical catheter was advanced 4 to 5 cm beyond the needle tip without attempts to elicit quadriceps contractions via the catheter. After bolus injection of 10 mL lidocaine 1%, ropivacaine 0.2% at 10 mL/h was continuously infused through both catheters for 4 hours. Success of femoral block was defined as loss of sensation to cold and pinprick stimuli. Quality of successful block was determined by tolerance to transcutaneous electrical stimulation and force dynamometry of quadriceps strength. Results: Block success was 100% via the stimulating catheters versus 85% via the nonstimulating catheters (P = .07). Overall tolerance to transcutaneous electrical stimulation (P = .009) and overall depth of motor block (P = .03) was significantly higher in the stimulating catheter-guided femoral nerve blocks. Conclusions: In this volunteer study, there was no statistically significant difference in block success between the two techniques. However, stimulating catheter-guided placement provided an increased overall quality of continuous femoral perineural blockade. Further studies are needed to verify these observations in the clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 220
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect on Neurostimulation of Injectates Used for Perineural Space Expansion Before Placement of a Stimulating Catheter Normal Saline Versus Dextrose 5% in Water
    Dang, Charles Pham
    Lelong, Aurelie
    Guilley, Jerome
    Nguyen, Jean Michel
    Volteau, Christelle
    Venet, Guillaume
    Perrier, Cyril
    Lejus, Corinne
    Blanloeil, Yvonnick
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2009, 34 (05) : 398 - 403
  • [42] Comparison of colonoscopic versus fluoroscopic colonic manometry catheter placement in children
    Leone, Anna E.
    van der Zande, Julia M. J.
    Srinivas, Shruthi
    Knaus, Maria
    Wood, Richard J.
    Hogan, Mark J.
    Benninga, Marc A.
    Sanchez, Raul E.
    Puri, Neetu Bali
    Vaz, Karla
    Yacob, Desale
    Di Lorenzo, Carlo
    Lu, Peter L.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2025, 80 (02): : 282 - 289
  • [43] COMPARISON OF COLONOSCOPIC VERSUS FLUOROSCOPIC COLONIC MANOMETRY CATHETER PLACEMENT IN CHILDREN
    Leone, Anna
    Srinivas, Shruthi
    Knaus, Maria E.
    Wood, Richard J.
    Bali, Neetu
    Vaz, Karla K.
    Yacob, Desale
    Di Lorenzo, Carlo
    Lu, Peter L.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 164 (06) : S955 - S955
  • [44] Percutaneous ultrasound-guided versus open cut-down access to femoral vessels for the placement of a REBOA catheter
    Grechenig, Peter
    Hallmann, Barbara
    Eibinger, Nicolas Rene
    Koutp, Amir
    Zajic, Paul
    Hofler, Gerald
    Puchwein, Paul
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [45] Posterior Versus Anterolateral Approach Interscalene Catheter Placement A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Fredrickson, Michael J.
    Ball, Craig M.
    Dalgleish, Adam J.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2011, 36 (02) : 125 - 133
  • [46] A Comparison of Single Shot Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Catheter for Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Ludwigson, Jordan L.
    Tillmans, Samuel D.
    Galgon, Richard E.
    Chambers, Tamara A.
    Heiner, John P.
    Schroeder, Kristopher M.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (09): : 68 - 71
  • [47] A comparison of single shot adductor canal block versus femoral nerve catheter for total knee arthroplasty
    Chambers, T.
    Ludwigson, J.
    Schrioder, K.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2015, 16 (04): : S68 - S68
  • [48] Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement
    Stolz, Lori A.
    Cappa, Anthony R.
    Minckler, Michael R.
    Stolz, Uwe
    Wyatt, Ryan G.
    Binger, Carl W.
    Amini, Richard
    Adhikari, Srikar
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2016, 17 (04): : 366 - 370
  • [49] Hematoma After Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block With Catheter Placement: A Case Report
    Williamson, Emily S.
    Hughes, James A.
    Bentley, Claire M.
    Neely, Grant A.
    Hollis, Nicole M.
    A & A PRACTICE, 2022, 16 (12): : E01653
  • [50] Novel needle guide reduces time to perform ultrasound-guided femoral nerve catheter placement A randomised controlled trial
    Turan, Alparslan
    Babazade, Rovnat
    Elsharkawy, Hesham
    Esa, Wael Ali Sakr
    Maheshwari, Kamal
    Farag, Ehab
    Zimmerman, Nicole M.
    Soliman, Loran Mounir
    Sessler, Daniel I.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 34 (03) : 135 - 140