Prospective comparison of continuous femoral nerve block with nonstimulating catheter placement versus stimulating catheter-guided perineural placement in volunteers

被引:77
|
作者
Salinas, FV
Neal, JM
Sueda, LA
Kopacz, DJ
Liu, SS
机构
[1] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
continuous femoral nerve block; peripheral stimulating catheters; transcutaenous electrical stimulation;
D O I
10.1016/j.rapm.2004.02.009
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: Stimulating catheter-guided perineural placement may potentially increase the success rate and quality of continuous femoral nerve block as compared with a nonstimulating catheter technique. These hypotheses have not been rigorously tested. Methods: Twenty volunteers underwent placement of bilateral femoral nerve catheters in this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. For each side, a stimulating needle was advanced until quadriceps contractions were obtained at less than or equal to0.5 mA. On one side, a stimulating catheter was advanced 4 to 5 cm beyond the needle tip while eliciting quadriceps contractions via the catheter. If quadriceps contractions decreased or disappeared, the catheter position was adjusted until quadriceps contractions could be elicited at less than or equal to0.5 mA. On the contralateral side, an identical catheter was advanced 4 to 5 cm beyond the needle tip without attempts to elicit quadriceps contractions via the catheter. After bolus injection of 10 mL lidocaine 1%, ropivacaine 0.2% at 10 mL/h was continuously infused through both catheters for 4 hours. Success of femoral block was defined as loss of sensation to cold and pinprick stimuli. Quality of successful block was determined by tolerance to transcutaneous electrical stimulation and force dynamometry of quadriceps strength. Results: Block success was 100% via the stimulating catheters versus 85% via the nonstimulating catheters (P = .07). Overall tolerance to transcutaneous electrical stimulation (P = .009) and overall depth of motor block (P = .03) was significantly higher in the stimulating catheter-guided femoral nerve blocks. Conclusions: In this volunteer study, there was no statistically significant difference in block success between the two techniques. However, stimulating catheter-guided placement provided an increased overall quality of continuous femoral perineural blockade. Further studies are needed to verify these observations in the clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 220
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perineural catheter placement for a continuous nerve block: A single operator technique
    Ilfeld, BM
    Enneking, FK
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2003, 28 (02) : 154 - 155
  • [2] Does "Opening the Perineural Space" Before Stimulating Catheter Placement for Continuous Nerve Block Add Value in Clinical Practice?
    Ficarrotta, Meghan R.
    Morey, Timothy E.
    Boezaart, Andre P.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2010, 35 (03) : 245 - 248
  • [3] Continuous Femoral Nerve Block Under Ultrasound Guidance: Perineural Opening Before Catheter Placement Is Perhaps No Longer Necessary
    Dang, Charles Pham
    Langlois, Cecile
    Lambert, Chantal
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2011, 36 (01) : 89 - 89
  • [4] Is there any need for expanding the perineural space before catheter placement in continuous femoral nerve blocks?
    Dang, Charles Pham
    Guilley, Jerome
    Dernis, Lyndia
    Langlois, Cecile
    Lambert, Chantal
    Nguyen, Jean-Michel
    Pinaud, Michel
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2006, 31 (05) : 393 - 400
  • [5] Use of a stimulating catheter for femoral nerve block
    Jack, N
    Liem, E
    Vonhögen, L
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 96 (01) : 139 - 140
  • [6] A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED VERSUS PALPATION METHOD FOR RADIAL ARTERY CATHETER PLACEMENT
    Kumar, Kamal
    Khuwaja, Amin Muhammad
    Mangi, Ali Raza
    Khan, Sajjad Ahmed
    Tariq, Hamna
    Zaheeruddin, Sayed
    Akhtar, Saleha
    PAKISTAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 56 (01): : 28 - 32
  • [7] Femoral Vein Thrombus Diagnosed during Ultrasound-guided Femoral Nerve Catheter Placement
    Sullivan, Timothy R.
    Rose, Peter
    McCartney, Colin J. L.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 131 (02) : 400 - 400
  • [8] Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Femoral Nerve Block for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty Catheter Perpendicular to the Nerve Versus Catheter Parallel to the Nerve
    Wang, Ai-Zhong
    Gu, LingLing
    Zhou, Quan-Hong
    Ni, Wen-Zong
    Jiang, Wei
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2010, 35 (02) : 127 - 131
  • [9] Prospective randomized comparison of an ultrasound-guided embryo transfer versus a blind catheter placement.
    Marconi, G
    Young, E
    Vilela, M
    Bello, A
    Young, E
    Sueldo, C
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 : S130 - S130
  • [10] Does femoral nerve catheter placement with stimulating catheters improve effective placement? A randomized, controlled, and observer-blinded trial
    Morin, AM
    Eberhart, LHJ
    Behnke, HKE
    Wagner, S
    Koch, T
    Wolf, U
    Nau, W
    Kill, C
    Geldner, G
    Wulf, H
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 100 (05): : 1503 - 1510