Engaging the consumer: The opposing forces of regulatory nonfit versus fit

被引:21
|
作者
Lee, Angela Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
FOCUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcps.2009.02.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Higgins and Scholer (Higgins, E. T., and Scholer, A. A. (2009). Engaging the consumer: The science and art of the value creation process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(2), 100-114) propose that while opposing forces do not create value, value is created when people engage in the act of countering these forces. To the extent that feeling wrong from regulatory nonfit may be perceived as an opposing force, their hypothesis can be extended to understanding regulatory nonfit effects. More specifically, while regulatory nonfit does not create value, the experience of regulatory nonfit may signal that something "feels wrong". Consumers may be prompted to counter this feeling wrong experience when they are involved in the decision making process, and this intervention in turn leads to value creation. (C) 2009 Society for Consumer Psychology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 136
页数:3
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [21] The Influence of Regulatory Focus on Global Consumption Orientation and Preference for Global Versus Local Consumer Culture Positioning
    Westjohn, Stanford A.
    Arnold, Mark J.
    Magnusson, Peter
    Reynolds, Kristy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MARKETING, 2016, 24 (02) : 22 - 39
  • [22] Opposing Effects of CTLA4 Insufficiency on Regulatory versus Conventional T Cells in Autoimmunity Converge on Effector Memory in Target Tissue
    Devarajan, Priyadharshini
    Miska, Jason
    Lui, Jen Bon
    Swieboda, Dominika
    Chen, Zhibin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2014, 193 (09): : 4368 - 4380
  • [23] Application of the theory of regulatory fit to promote adherence to evidence-based breast cancer screening recommendations: experimental versus longitudinal evidence
    Petrocchi, Serena
    Ludolph, Ramona
    Labrie, Nanon H. M.
    Schulz, Peter
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (11):