Operative outcomes of adult living donor liver transplantation and deceased donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:87
|
作者
Wan, Ping [1 ]
Yu, Xin [2 ]
Xia, Qiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Ren Ji Hosp, Dept Liver Surg, Shanghai 200127, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
HEPATITIS-C RECURRENCE; BILIARY COMPLICATIONS; FIBROSIS PROGRESSION; RECIPIENT MORBIDITY; SINGLE-CENTER; SURVIVAL; MANAGEMENT; DISEASE; COHORT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/lt.23836
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has emerged as an alternative to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) because of the increasing number of patients waiting for liver transplantation (LT). However, whether it can achieve operative outcomes similar to those achieved with DDLT for adult patients remains controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the operative outcomes of LDLT and DDLT recipients. A literature search was performed to identify clinical controlled studies comparing LDLT and DDLT that were published before October 2013. Four perioperative outcomes [duration of the recipient operation (DRO), red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirement, length of the hospital stay, and cold ischemia time (CIT)] and 5 postoperative complication outcomes (biliary complications, vascular complications, intra-abdominal bleeding, perioperative death, and retransplantation) were the main outcomes assessed. Nineteen studies with a total of 5450 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In comparison with DDLT, LDLT was associated with a significantly longer DRO and a shorter CIT. We found that biliary complications [odds ratio (OR) = 3.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.97-4.81, P < 0.001], vascular complications (OR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.32-3.54, P = 0.002), and retransplantation (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.09-2.83, P = 0.02) occurred more frequently for LDLT recipients, and the subgroup analysis indicated that the biliary complication rate decreased dramatically with greater LDLT experience. No significant difference was observed in RBC transfusion requirements, the lengths of hospital stays, intra-abdominal bleeding rates, or perioperative mortality between LDLT and DDLT recipients. In conclusion, LDLT is associated with a higher rate of surgical complications after transplantation. A reduction of postoperative complication rates can be achieved as centers gain greater experience with LDLT. However, LDLT is still an excellent alternative to DDLT because it facilitates access to LT. Liver Transpl 20:425-436, 2014. (c) 2014 AASLD.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 436
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Outcomes of living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure: The adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study
    Campsen, Jeffrey
    Blei, Andres T.
    Emond, Jean C.
    Everhart, James E.
    Freise, Chris E.
    Lok, Anna S.
    Saab, Sammy
    Wisniewski, Karen A.
    Trotter, James F.
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 14 (09) : 1273 - 1280
  • [42] ABO-Incompatible Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation in the Era of Rituximab: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yadav, Dipesh Kumar
    Hua, Yong Fei
    Bai, Xueli
    Lou, Jianying
    Que, Risheng
    Gao, Shunling
    Zhang, Yun
    Wang, Ji
    Xie, Qinfen
    Edoo, Muhammad Ibrahim Alhadi
    Chutturghoon, Vikram Kumar
    Liang, Tingbo
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 2019
  • [43] Long Way To Go for Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation in India: Comparison of Outcomes of Living Donor and Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation from a Single Centre
    Reddy, Mettu S.
    Rajkumar, Akila
    Shrivatsav, Manoj
    Rajalingam, Rajesh
    Vargese, Joy
    Cherian, Thomas
    Shanmugham, Vivekanandan
    Perumalla, Rajasekhar
    Olithselvan, Olithselvan
    Jothimani, Dinesh K.
    Rela, Mohamed
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 20 : S346 - S346
  • [44] Outcomes of adult living donor vs. deceased donor liver transplantation from the time of listing
    Shah, Shimul A.
    Levy, Gary A.
    McGilvray, Ian D.
    Smith, Robert
    Adcock, Lesley D.
    Girgrah, Nigel
    Lilly, Les B.
    Greig, Paul D.
    Cattral, Mark S.
    Grant, David R.
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 44 (04) : 191A - 192A
  • [45] A systematic review and meta-analysis of donor ischaemic preconditioning in liver transplantation
    Robertson, Francis P.
    Magill, Louise J.
    Wright, Graham P.
    Fuller, Barry
    Davidson, Brian R.
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 29 (11) : 1147 - 1154
  • [46] Living Donor Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation for HCC
    Sait Murat Doğan
    Koray Kutlutürk
    [J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, 2020, 51 : 1104 - 1106
  • [47] Living Donor Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation for HCC
    Dogan, Sait Murat
    Kutluturk, Koray
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2020, 51 (04) : 1104 - 1106
  • [48] Different techniques for harvesting grafts for living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hui Li
    Jun-Bin Zhang
    Xiao-Long Chen
    Lei Fan
    Li Wang
    Shi-Hui Li
    Qiao-Lan Zheng
    Xiao-Ming Wang
    Yang Yang
    Gui-Hua Chen
    Gen-Shu Wang
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2017, 23 (20) : 3730 - 3743
  • [49] Outcomes of donor evaluation in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation
    Trotter, James F.
    Wisniewski, Karen A.
    Terrault, Norah A.
    Everhart, James E.
    Kinkhabwala, Milan
    Weinrieb, Robert M.
    Fair, Jeffrey H.
    Fisher, Robert A.
    Koffron, Alan J.
    Saab, Sammy
    Merion, Robert M.
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (05) : 1476 - 1484
  • [50] Donor and recipient outcomes after adult living donor liver transplantation
    Humar, A
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (10) : S42 - S44