Discrepancy-based adaptive regularization for GRAPPA reconstruction

被引:35
|
作者
Qu, Peng [1 ]
Wang, Chunsheng [1 ]
Shen, Gary X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
parallel imaging; GRAPPA; regularization; discrepancy principle; L-curve;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.20620
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop a novel regularization method for GRAPPA by which the regularization parameters can be optimally and adaptively chosen. Materials and Methods: In the fit procedures in GRAPPA, the discrepancy principle, which chooses the regularization parameter based on a priori information about the noise level in the autocalibrating signals (ACS), is used with the truncated singular value decomposition (TSVD) regularization and the Tikhonov regularization, and its performance is compared with the singular value (SV) threshold method and the L-curve method, respectively by axial and sagittal head imaging experiments. Results: In both axial and sagittal reconstructions, normal GRAPPA reconstruction results exhibit a relatively high level of noise. With discrepancy-based choices of parameters, regularization can improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) with only a very modest increase in aliasing artifacts. The L-curve method in all of the reconstructions leads to overregularization, which causes severe residual aliasing artifacts. The 10% SV threshold method yields good overall image quality in the axial case, but in the sagittal case it also leads to an obvious increase in aliasing artifacts. Conclusion: Neither a fixed SV threshold nor the L-curve are robust means of choosing the appropriate parameters in GRAPPA reconstruction. However, with the discrepancy-based parameter-choice strategy, adaptively regularized GRAPPA can be used to automatically choose nearly optimal parameters for reconstruction and achieve an excellent compromise between SNR and artifacts.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 255
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Learning Kernel for Conditional Moment-Matching Discrepancy-Based Image Classification
    Ren, Chuan-Xian
    Ge, Pengfei
    Dai, Dao-Qing
    Yan, Hong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2021, 51 (04) : 2006 - 2018
  • [32] Discrepancy-Based Theory and Algorithms for Forecasting Non-Stationary Time Series
    Vitaly Kuznetsov
    Mehryar Mohri
    Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 88 : 367 - 399
  • [33] A Graph Embedding Framework for Maximum Mean Discrepancy-Based Domain Adaptation Algorithms
    Chen, Yiming
    Song, Shiji
    Li, Shuang
    Wu, Cheng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2020, 29 : 199 - 213
  • [34] Discrepancy-Based Theory and Algorithms for Forecasting Non-Stationary Time Series
    Kuznetsov, Vitaly
    Mohri, Mehryar
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 88 (04) : 367 - 399
  • [35] A Discrepancy-Based Framework to Compare Robustness Between Multi-attribute Evaluations
    Raimbault, Juste
    COMPLEX SYSTEMS DESIGN & MANAGEMENT (CSD&M 2016), 2017, : 141 - 154
  • [36] A nonlinear regularization strategy for GRAPPA calibration
    Bydder, Mark
    Jung, Youngkyoo
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 27 (01) : 137 - 141
  • [37] A Novel Maximum Mean Discrepancy-Based Semi-Supervised Learning Algorithm
    Huang, Qihang
    He, Yulin
    Huang, Zhexue
    MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [38] Regularization Method for Building Contour Based on BidirectionalDriven Adaptive Segmentation and Reconstruction
    Zhong Kang
    Gao Xianjun
    Yang Yuanwei
    Tan Meilin
    Pan Meimei
    LASER & OPTOELECTRONICS PROGRESS, 2023, 60 (20)
  • [39] Inferring differentially expressed pathways using kernel maximum mean discrepancy-based test
    Esteban Vegas
    Josep M. Oller
    Ferran Reverter
    BMC Bioinformatics, 17
  • [40] Robust GRAPPA reconstruction
    Huo, Donglai
    Wilson, David L.
    2006 3RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING: MACRO TO NANO, VOLS 1-3, 2006, : 37 - +