Biases on cosmological parameter estimators from galaxy cluster number counts

被引:11
|
作者
Penna-Lima, M. [1 ,2 ]
Makler, M. [2 ]
Wuensche, C. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Pesquisas Espaciais, Div Astrofis, BR-12227010 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
[2] Ctr Brasileiro Pesquisas Fis, BR-22290180 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
cluster counts; cosmological parameters from LSS; MASS FUNCTION; CONSTRAINTS; OMEGA(M);
D O I
10.1088/1475-7516/2014/05/039
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) surveys are promising probes of cosmology - in particular for Dark Energy (DE) -, given their ability to find distant clusters and provide estimates for their mass. However, current SZ catalogs contain tens to hundreds of objects and maximum likelihood estimators may present biases for such sample sizes. In this work we study estimators from cluster abundance for some cosmological parameters, in particular the DE equation of state parameter w(0), the amplitude of density fluctuations sigma(8), and the Dark Matter density parameter Omega(c). We begin by deriving an unbinned likelihood for cluster number counts, showing that it is equivalent to the one commonly used in the literature. We use the Monte Carlo approach to determine the presence of bias using this likelihood and study its behavior with both the area and depth of the survey, and the number of cosmological parameters fitted. Our fiducial models are based on the South Pole Telescope (SPT) SZ survey. Assuming perfect knowledge of mass and redshift some estimators have non-negligible biases. For example, the bias of sigma(8) corresponds to about 40% of its statistical error bar when fitted together with Omega(c), and w(0). Including a SZ mass-observable relation decreases the relevance of the bias, for the typical sizes of current SZ surveys. Considering a joint likelihood for cluster abundance and the so-called "distance priors", we obtain that the biases are negligible compared to the statistical errors. However, we show that the biases from SZ estimators do not go away with increasing sample sizes and they may become the dominant source of error for an all sky survey at the SPT sensitivity. Finally, we compute the confidence regions for the cosmological parameters using Fisher matrix and profile likelihood approaches, showing that they are compatible with the Monte Carlo ones. The results of this work validate the use of the current maximum likelihood methods for present SZ surveys, but highlight the need for further studies for upcoming experiments. To perform the analyses of this work, we developed fast, accurate, and adaptable codes for cluster counts in the framework of the Numerical Cosmology Library.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Galaxy number counts and fractal correlations
    Europhys Lett, 1 (103):
  • [42] The bispectrum of relativistic galaxy number counts
    Di Dio, Enea
    Durrer, Ruth
    Marozzi, Giovanni
    Montanari, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2016, (01):
  • [43] Galaxy Number Counts as a Probe for Voids
    Bucklein, B. K.
    Moody, J. W.
    Hintz, E. G.
    GALAXIES IN ISOLATION: EXPLORING NATURE VERSUS NURTURE, 2010, 421 : 248 - 248
  • [44] Vector perturbations of galaxy number counts
    Durrer, Ruth
    Tansella, Vittorio
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2016, (07):
  • [45] The history of galaxies and galaxy number counts
    Shimasaku, K
    Fukugita, M
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 501 (02): : 578 - 596
  • [46] Redshift weighted galaxy number counts
    Matthewson, William L.
    Stock, Dennis
    Durrer, Ruth
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2022, (09):
  • [47] GALAXY NUMBER COUNTS FROM K=10 TO K=23
    GARDNER, JP
    COWIE, LL
    WAINSCOAT, RJ
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 415 (01): : L9 - L12
  • [48] COSMOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS FROM GALAXY CLUSTERING AND THE MASS-TO-NUMBER RATIO OF GALAXY CLUSTERS
    Tinker, Jeremy L.
    Sheldon, Erin S.
    Wechsler, Risa H.
    Becker, Matthew R.
    Rozo, Eduardo
    Zu, Ying
    Weinberg, David H.
    Zehavi, Idit
    Blanton, Michael R.
    Busha, Michael T.
    Koester, Benjamin P.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 745 (01):
  • [49] The XXL Survey XXV. Cosmological analysis of the C1 cluster number counts
    Pacaud, F.
    Pierre, M.
    Melin, J. -B.
    Adami, C.
    Evrard, A. E.
    Galli, S.
    Gastaldello, F.
    Maughan, B. J.
    Sereno, M.
    Alis, S.
    Altieri, B.
    Birkinshaw, M.
    Chiappetti, L.
    Faccioli, L.
    Giles, P. A.
    Horellou, C.
    Iovino, A.
    Koulouridis, E.
    Le Fevre, J. -P.
    Lidman, C.
    Lieu, M.
    Maurogordato, S.
    Moscardini, L.
    Plionis, M.
    Poggianti, B. M.
    Pompei, E.
    Sadibekova, T.
    Valtchanov, I.
    Willis, J. P.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2018, 620
  • [50] The Galaxy Cluster Mass Scale and Its Impact on Cosmological Constraints from the Cluster Population
    G. W. Pratt
    M. Arnaud
    A. Biviano
    D. Eckert
    S. Ettori
    D. Nagai
    N. Okabe
    T. H. Reiprich
    Space Science Reviews, 2019, 215