An integrated framework to evaluate the equity of urban public facilities using spatial multi-criteria analysis

被引:118
|
作者
Taleai, M. [1 ]
Sliuzas, R. [2 ]
Flacke, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Ctr Excellence Geomat Informat Technol, Geomat Fac, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Twente, Fac Geoinformat Sci & Earth Observat, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Multi-criteria evaluation; Multi-functional land uses; Linkage among land uses; Spatial equity; GIS; ACCESSIBILITY; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2014.04.006
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Spatial equity is an important component of sustainable urban planning. We introduce an Integrated Spatial Equity Evaluation (ISEE) framework based on spatial multi-criteria analysis to assess spatial equity. This framework measures the balance between demands generated by residential areas and supply offered by urban services at various spatial scales. It considers the balance between different types of services at one spatial scale, and the balance between the same type of services across different spatial scales, applying an absolute measure of spatial equity at parcel level based on geographic analysis and Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis (SMCA) methods. Its application is demonstrated in a case study area in Tehran, Iran by evaluating equitable access to several basic services used mostly by children. The results show that overall the case study area has an oversupply of educational services and an undersupply of recreational services, while some parts of the case study area have insufficient access to these services within a reasonable distance. The ISEE outputs can be readily visualised and interpreted providing urban planners with parcel level information to aid their decisions on how to equitably balance demand and supply for urban facilities and services. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 69
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Geotechnical land suitability assessment using spatial multi-criteria decision analysis
    Akyol, E.
    Kaya, A.
    Alkan, M.
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2016, 9 (07)
  • [42] Geotechnical land suitability assessment using spatial multi-criteria decision analysis
    E. Akyol
    A. Kaya
    M. Alkan
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2016, 9
  • [43] A spatiotemporal analysis of oil spill severity using a multi-criteria decision framework
    Nelson, Jake R.
    Grubesic, Tony H.
    Ocean and Coastal Management, 2021, 199
  • [44] Urban flood susceptibility analysis of Saroor Nagar Watershed of India using Geomatics-based multi-criteria analysis framework
    Vaddiraju, Shiva Chandra
    Talari, Reshma
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (49) : 107021 - 107040
  • [45] A multi-criteria spatial analysis using GIS to evaluate potential sites for a new border gate on Turkey's Syria frontier
    Kabak, Mehmet
    Ozceylan, Eren
    Erbas, Mehmet
    Cetinkaya, Cihan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 14 (03) : 265 - 300
  • [46] A probabilistic multi-criteria evaluation framework for integrated energy system planning
    Zhou, Fan
    Chen, Long
    Zhao, Jun
    Wang, Wei
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2022, 610 : 156 - 170
  • [47] A multi-criteria spatial approach for mapping urban ecosystem services demand
    Li, Fangzheng
    Guo, Shiyi
    Li, Di
    Li, Xiong
    Li, Jing
    Xie, Shuang
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 112
  • [48] Multi-criteria valuation of flexibility initiatives using integrated TISM - IRP with a big data framework
    Sushil
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2017, 28 (11-12) : 999 - 1010
  • [49] Public choice of urban water service management: a multi-criteria approach
    Ruiz-Villaverde, Alberto
    Gonzalez-Gomez, Francisco
    Picazo-Tadeo, Andres J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 29 (03) : 385 - 399
  • [50] Equitable Prioritization of Bridge Rehabilitation Projects Using a Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Support Framework
    Mohamadiazar, Nasim
    Ebrahimian, Ali
    Azizinamini, Atorod
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2024, 2678 (12) : 2059 - 2076