Image Quality Assessment by Integration of Low-level & High-Level Features: Threshold Similarity Index

被引:1
|
作者
Chaudhary, Jatin [1 ]
Pant, Dibakar Raj [2 ]
Pokharel, Suresh [2 ]
Skon, Jukka-Pekka [3 ]
Heikkonen, Jukka [1 ]
Kanth, Rajeev [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept Comp, Turku, Finland
[2] Tribhuvan Univ, Inst Engn, Kathmandu, Nepal
[3] Savonia Univ Appl Sci, Sch Informat Technol, Kuopio, Finland
关键词
Threshold Similarity Index; Feature Similarity Index; Structural Similarity Index; Image Quality Assessment;
D O I
10.1109/ISIE51582.2022.9831651
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The increase in the implementation of deep learning models in image processing has shifted its focus towards better-performing models within the ambit, directly proportional to the size of the dataset. A common approach to increasing the available data for training is via data augmentation. Additional data is created either by modifying gathered data or creating synthetic data based on the seed dataset. This article presents an approach to validating synthetic images generated by a Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network (DCGAN) using full-reference image quality assessment techniques. We have presented an algorithm based on the Threshold Similarity Index(TSI) to validate synthetically generated images. The TSI becomes a special index. TSI calculation has been done by amalgamating high-level features like luminance, contrast, structure, and low-level features like edges and zero crossings of the correlated images. TSI becomes an integrated matrix of our algorithm by incorporating the features of SSIM and FSIM both. The developed algorithm has been verified by generating synthetic images using the DCGAN model, which generated 35 images. The TSIFSIM and TSISSIM of this model were calculated to be 0.637 and 0.127 respectively. The proposed algorithm validated 85,7% of synthetically generated images to be included in the seed dataset.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 141
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Using CBR learning for the low-level and high-level unit of an image interpretation system
    Perner, P
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1999, : 45 - 54
  • [42] Connecting Low-Level Image Processing and High-Level Vision via Deep Learning
    Liu, Ding
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, : 5775 - 5776
  • [43] MLSIM: A Multi-Level Similarity index for image quality assessment
    Zhang, Hu
    Huang, Yan
    Chen, Xi
    Deng, Dexiang
    SIGNAL PROCESSING-IMAGE COMMUNICATION, 2013, 28 (10) : 1464 - 1477
  • [44] Mobile robot motion by integration of low-level behavior control and high-level global planning
    Ma, CY
    Li, W
    Liu, LF
    INFORMATION INTELLIGENCE AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4, 1996, : 310 - 315
  • [45] Blind Tone-Mapped HDR Image Quality Measurement by Analysis of Low-Level and High-Level Perceptual Characteristics
    Cui, Yueli
    Yu, Mei
    Jiang, Gangyi
    Peng, Zongju
    Chen, Fen
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2022, 71
  • [46] Inferring high-level behavior from low-level sensors
    Patterson, DJ
    Lin, LA
    Fox, D
    Kautz, H
    UBICOMP 2003: UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, 2003, 2864 : 73 - 89
  • [48] Reconciling High-Level Optimizations and Low-Level Code in LLVM
    Lee, Juneyoung
    Hur, Chung-Kil
    Jung, Ralf
    Liu, Zhengyang
    Regehr, John
    Lopes, Nuno P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM ON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES-PACMPL, 2018, 2
  • [49] LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE-WASTES, HIGH-LEVEL RISK
    NEWMAN, A
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 28 (11) : A488 - A491
  • [50] Drawing the boundary between low-level and high-level mindreading
    de Vignemont, Frederique
    PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2009, 144 (03) : 457 - 466