Cutting the Gordian Knot of Communication Research

This article argues that the perceived deficiencies of Communication Research are not due to derivative research, but result from the inappropriate application of paradigmatic thinking to the field. Instead, I advance the view that paradigmatic incommensurability should not be thought of as disciplinary ships passing in the night, but rather a bustling port where disparate ideas and theories meet and propagate. Beginning with a brief discussion of Kuhn and paradigms, I use the sub-field of Framing as a synecdoche for Communication Research to exemplify the utility that stems from theoretical cross-pollination. In conclusion, embracing perspectives from competing communicative traditions is an invaluable basis for solving real world problems, and a legitimate praxis through which Communication Research can return something of value to society.