FDG PET and tumour markers in the diagnosis of recurrent and metastatic breast cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Siggelkow, W [1 ]
Rath, W
Buell, U
Zimny, M
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, D-5100 Aachen, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Dept Nucl Med, D-5100 Aachen, Germany
[3] Klinikum RWTH Aachen, Frauenklin, Aachen, Germany
关键词
breast cancer; recurrence; metastasis; tumour marker; positron emission tomography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Breast cancer continues to be one of the most common cancers in North America and Western Europe. Positron emission tomography with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG PET) represents a non-invasive functional imaging modality that is based on metabolic characteristics of malignant tumours. In breast cancer, FDG PET is more accurate than conventional methods for staging of distant metastases or local recurrences and enables early assessment of treatment response in patients undergoing primary chemotherapy. Recent data indicate a rationale for the use of FDG PET in cases of asymptomatically elevated tumour marker levels in the presence of uncertain results of conventional imaging. Despite the fact that PET cannot rule out microscopic disease, it does have particular value in providing, in a single examination, a reliable assessment of the true extent of the disease. This technique is complementary to morphological imaging for primary diagnosis, staging and re-staging. It may become the method of choice for the assessment of asymptomatic patients with elevated tumour marker levels. This method, however, cannot replace invasive procedures if microscopic disease is of clinical relevance.
引用
收藏
页码:S118 / S124
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Metabolic tumour volume by 18F-FDG PET/CT is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer
    Ahn, H.
    Hyun, S. H.
    Park, S.
    Lee, S. J.
    Kim, J. Y.
    Ahn, J. S.
    Im, Y. -H.
    Park, Y. H.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [32] Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET imaging for the detection of recurrent or metastatic gynecologic cancer
    Nasim Khan
    Noboru Oriuchi
    Akira Yosmzaki
    Tatsuya Kanuma
    Tetsuya Higuchi
    Keigo Endo
    Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 2005, 19 : 137 - 145
  • [33] Clinical value of FDG PET/CT and tumor markers for recurrent gastric cancer
    Choi, Y.
    Hwang, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2014, 41 : S486 - S486
  • [34] Accuracy of whole body FDG PET for the detection of recurrent or metastatic breast carcinoma.
    Moon, DH
    Hoh, CK
    Silverman, DS
    Glaspy, JA
    Phelps, ME
    Maddahi, J
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1996, 37 (05) : 386 - 386
  • [35] Performance of FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis of recurrent uterine cervical cancer
    Kazuhiro Kitajima
    Koji Murakami
    Erena Yamasaki
    Yasushi Domeki
    Yasushi Kaji
    Kazuro Sugimura
    European Radiology, 2008, 18
  • [36] Performance of FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis of recurrent uterine cervical cancer
    Kitajima, Kazuhiro
    Murakami, Koji
    Yamasaki, Erena
    Domeki, Yasushi
    Kaji, Yasushi
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (10) : 2040 - 2047
  • [37] Inhomogeneous PET/CT-FDG response to therapy in metastatic breast cancer
    Espinet, Carina
    Rager, Olivier
    Ulaner, Gary
    Jochelson, Maxine
    Weber, Wolfgang
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55
  • [38] FAPI Compared with FDG PET/CT for Diagnosis of Primary and Metastatic Lung Cancer
    Wei, Yuchun
    Ma, Li
    Li, Pei
    Lu, Jie
    Ren, Jiazhong
    Yan, Shoumei
    Wu, Hongbo
    Yuan, Shuanghu
    Fu, Zheng
    Yu, Jinming
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 308 (02)
  • [39] The clinical impact of FDG-PET in the management of recurrent breast cancer.
    Shankar, LK
    Oberhofer, MT
    Ziessman, HA
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 42 (05) : 297P - 297P
  • [40] The Prognostic Value of FDG PET/CT Quantitative Parameters in Recurrent Breast Cancer
    Taghipour, Mehdi
    Wray, Rick
    Sheikhbahaei, Sara
    Subramaniam, Rathan
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (03)