Comparison of the design criteria of 141 onsite wastewater treatment systems available on the French market

被引:10
|
作者
Dubois, V. [1 ]
Boutin, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] IRSTEA, Ecol & Pollut Unit, Freshwater Syst, 5 rue Doua,BP 32108, F-32108 Villeurbanne, France
关键词
Attached growth on fine media; On-site system; Suspended growth; Wastewater treatment systems; SMALL COMMUNITIES; PLANTS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
New EC standards published in 2009 led to a surge in onsite wastewater treatment systems reaching the European market. Here we summarize their technical aspects and compare them to known values used in centralized wastewater treatment. The paper deals with two types of processes: attached-growth systems (AGS) on fine media and suspended-growth systems (SGS). Covering 141 technical approvals and 36 manufacturers, we compare onsite design criteria against the centralized wastewater design criteria for each process. The systems use a wide range of materials for bacterial growth, from soil, sand or gravel to zeolite, coconut shavings or rockwool cubes, with a huge range of variation in useful surface, from 0.26 m(2)/PE for one rockwool cube filter to 5 m2/PE for a (traditional system) vertical sand filter. Some rockwool can handle applied daily surface load of 160 g BOD5/m(2). SGS design parameters range from 0.025 to 0.34 kg BOD5 per kg MLVSS/d with hydraulic retention times of 0.28-3.7 d. For clarifier design, water velocity ranges from 0.15 to 1.47 m/h. In the sludge line, sludge storage volume ranges from 0.125 down to just 0.56 m(3)/PE. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 304
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] National onsite wastewater treatment: A National Small Flows Clearinghouse summary of onsite systems in the United States, 1993
    Angoli, T
    ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDIVIDUAL AND SMALL COMMUNITY SEWAGE SYSTEMS, 1998, : 1 - 11
  • [22] Design Criteria for Energy Efficient Wastewater Treatment
    Alekseeva, N., V
    Dzhubari, M. K.
    FIBRE CHEMISTRY, 2022, 53 (06) : 437 - 439
  • [23] Design Criteria for Energy Efficient Wastewater Treatment
    N.V. Alekseeva
    M.K. Dzhubari
    Fibre Chemistry, 2022, 53 : 437 - 439
  • [24] Estimating Natural Attenuation of Nitrate and Phosphorus From Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems
    Regensburger, Eric
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2024, 86 (08)
  • [25] Investigating the Relationship between Surface Water Pollution and Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems
    Jordan, Mallory A.
    Ojeda, Ann S.
    Larson, Eleanore A.
    Rogers, Stephanie R.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 57 (44) : 17042 - 17050
  • [26] Reasons why Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems are not Systematically Used in the Republic of Croatia
    Malus, D.
    Vouk, D.
    14TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM - WATER MANAGEMENT AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING 2015, 2015, : 199 - 208
  • [27] Summary of the status of onsite wastewater treatment systems in the United States during 1998
    Angoli, T
    ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 315 - 321
  • [28] Microbial Community Profiles in Wastewaters from Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Technology
    Jalowiecki, Lukasz
    Chojniak, Joanna Malgorzata
    Dorgeloh, Elmar
    Hegedusova, Berta
    Ejhed, Helene
    Magner, Jorgen
    Plaza, Grazyna Anna
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (01):
  • [29] Adaptable improved onsite wastewater treatment systems for urban settlements in developing countries
    Kihila, Jacob M.
    Balengayabo, Jonas G.
    COGENT ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2020, 6 (01):
  • [30] Comparison of Nitrogen Treatment by Four Onsite Wastewater Systems in Nutrient-Sensitive Watersheds of the North Carolina Coastal Plain
    Humphrey Jr, Charles P.
    O'Driscoll, Michael
    Iverson, Guy
    NITROGEN, 2021, 2 (02): : 268 - 286