Life-cycle assessment and life-cycle cost analysis of decentralised rainwater harvesting, greywater recycling and hybrid rainwater-greywater systems

被引:54
|
作者
Leong, Janet Yip Cheng [1 ]
Balan, Poovarasi [1 ]
Chong, Meng Nan [1 ,2 ]
Poh, Phaik Eong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ Malaysia, Chem Engn Discipline, Sch Engn, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway 47500, Selangor Darul, Malaysia
[2] Monash Univ Malaysia, Adv Engn Platform, Sustainable Water Alliance, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway 47500, Selangor Darul, Malaysia
关键词
Water recycling and reuse; Urban water; Environmental impact; Cost analysis; Decentralised system; POTABLE WATER SAVINGS; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; REUSE; TECHNOLOGIES; FEASIBILITY; PERFORMANCE; CONSUMPTION; CHALLENGES; QUALITY; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Decentralised rainwater harvesting (RWH), greywater recycling (GWR), and hybrid rainwater-greywater systems (HRG) mitigate urban water scarcity at both domestic residential dwelling and commercial building scales. However, few studies have been conducted on HRG in mixed urban water provision schemes under tropical climatic conditions. Thus, this study evaluates and compares the environmental and economic impacts of a centralised mains water system (MWS) against a decentralised RWH, GWR and HRG at a domestic and commercial building using life-cycle assessment (LCA) and life-cycle cost (LCC) analysis under tropical climatic conditions. A functional unit (FU) of 1 m(3) of non-potable toilet flushing and irrigation water for a project lifespan of 50 years was used. Results indicate that CML 2001 and TRACI 2.1 methods produce similar results. LCA and LCC indicate that the optimal systems are the commercial HRG and domestic RWH. The commercial HRG has the highest mains water savings (55.3%), lowest environmental impact scores for seven categories, and is the second fastest system to become financially attractive at USD5.20/m(3). Similarly, the domestic RWH has the second highest mains water savings (95.3%), lowest environmental impact scores relative to a MWS for seven impact categories, and is the first system to become financially attractive at USD2.00/m(3). Sensitivity analysis revealed that global warming, water stress index, and eutrophication are most sensitive to a -/+ 20% variation in GW and RW energy intensity values at commercial and domestic buildings, respectively. The financial viability of decentralised RWH, GWR, and HRG systems increase with increasing discount rate and mains water tariff, as well as decreasing electricity tariff and installation factor. Financial incentives and subsidy schemes from the Malaysian government may promote uptake of decentralised water systems for mixed urban water provision, as none of the systems were financially attractive otherwise at a discount rate of 6% for 50 years. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1211 / 1224
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS FOR RAIL CONTROL SYSTEMS
    Ciszewski, Tomasz
    Nowakowski, Waldemar
    GLOBALIZATION AND ITS SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES, PTS I - VI, 2017, : 284 - 291
  • [22] Fundamentals of life-cycle cost analysis
    Lee, DB
    TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC POLICY 2002: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION, 2002, (1812): : 203 - 210
  • [23] LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND LIFE-CYCLE COST AS COLLABORATIVE TOOLS IN RESIDENTIAL HEATING SYSTEM SELECTION
    Glick, Scott
    Guggemos, Angela A.
    JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING, 2010, 5 (03): : 107 - 115
  • [24] Can Precise Irrigation Support the Sustainability of Protected Cultivation? A Life-Cycle Assessment and Life-Cycle Cost Analysis
    Canaj, Kledja
    Parente, Angelo
    D'Imperio, Massimiliano
    Boari, Francesca
    Buono, Vito
    Toriello, Michele
    Mehmeti, Andi
    Montesano, Francesco Fabiano
    WATER, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [25] Life-cycle cost analysis for infrastructure systems: Life-Cycle Cost vs. safety level vs. service life
    Furuta, H
    Kameda, T
    Fukuda, Y
    Frangopol, DM
    LIFE-CYCLE PERFORMANCE OF DETERIORATING STRUCTURES: ASSESSMENT, DESIGN, AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, : 19 - 25
  • [26] Life-cycle assessment - An abridged life-cycle assessment of electric vehicle batteries
    Steele, NLC
    Allen, DT
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 32 (01) : 40A - 46A
  • [27] Innovation in bridge life-cycle cost assessment
    Macek, Daniel
    Snizek, Vaclav
    CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE 2017, CCC 2017, 2017, 196 : 441 - 446
  • [28] Performance analysis and life cycle assessment of acrylic concrete structures for rainwater harvesting
    Bolhari, Azadeh
    Castaneda, Daniel I.
    Arehart, Jay H.
    Tillema, Shelby J.
    Resources, Conservation and Recycling Advances, 2022, 13
  • [29] Total life-cycle cost
    Smith, DK
    DURABILITY OF BUILDING MATERIALS AND COMPONENTS 8, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 1787 - 1797
  • [30] Life-Cycle Assessment and Life-Cycle Cost study of Banana (Musa sapienturn) fiber Biocomposite materials
    Joana Rodriguez, L.
    Orrego, Carlos E.
    Ribeiro, Ines
    Pecas, Paulo
    25TH CIRP LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING (LCE) CONFERENCE, 2018, 69 : 585 - 590