How costly are carbon offsets? A meta-analysis of carbon forest sinks

被引:113
|
作者
van Kooten, GC
Eagle, AJ
Manley, J
Smolak, T
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Dept Econ, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
climate change; Kyoto protocol; meta-regression analysis; carbon-uptake costs; forest sinks;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2004.05.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon terrestrial sinks are seen as a low-cost alternative to fuel switching and reduced fossil fuel use for lowering atmospheric CO2. As a result of agreements reached at Bonn and Marrakech, carbon offsets have taken on much greater importance in meeting Kyoto targets for the first commitment period. In this study, meta-regression analysis is used to examine 981 estimates from 55 studies of the costs of creating carbon offsets using forestry. Baseline estimates of costs of sequestering carbon through forest conservation are US$ 46.62-US$ 260.29/t C ($12.71-$70.99/t CO2). Tree planting and agroforestry activities increase costs by more than 200%. When post-harvest storage of carbon in wood products, or substitution of biomas for fossil fuels in energy production, are taken into account, costs are lowest-some $12.53-$68.44/t C ($3.42-$18.67/t CO2). Average costs are greater, between $116.76 and $1406.60/t C ($31.84-$383.62/t CO2), when appropriate account is taken of the opportunity costs of land. Peer review of the studies increases costs by a factor or 10 or more, depending on the model. The use of marginal cost estimates instead of average cost results in much higher costs for carbon sequestration, in the range of thousands of dollars per t C, although few studies used this method of cost assessment. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 251
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Time-Varying Evolution and Impact Analysis of Forest Tourism Carbon Emissions and Forest Park Carbon Sinks in China
    Wang, Liguo
    Zhao, Haoxiang
    Wu, Wenna
    Song, Wei
    Zhou, Qishan
    Ye, Yanting
    [J]. Forests, 2024, 15 (09):
  • [32] Research on Carbon Emission Trading Mechanism Including Forest Carbon Sinks
    Xie, Yuncheng
    Shao, Tengwei
    [J]. RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, PTS 1-7, 2012, 347-353 : 2967 - +
  • [33] Credited forest carbon sinks:: how the cost reduction is allocated among countries and sectors
    Pohjola, J
    Kerkelä, L
    Mäkipää, R
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2003, 3 (04) : 445 - 461
  • [34] Forest Carbon Offsets: Challenges in Measuring, Monitoring, and Verifying
    Sedjo, Roger
    Macauley, Molly
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 54 (04): : 16 - 23
  • [35] RESPONSE A Critique of "Forest Carbon Offsets: Possibilities and Limitations"
    Harmon, Mark E.
    Krankina, Olga N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2011, 109 (08) : 473 - 475
  • [36] Forest carbon offsets in Russia: current legal infrastructure
    Gordeeva, Y. M.
    Vedernikova, I. E.
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2022, (02): : 209 - 215
  • [37] Optimal Discounting of Forest Offsets in the Carbon Market.
    Kaushal, Kevin R.
    Rosendahl, Knut Einar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2022, 37 (02) : 352 - 352
  • [38] Forest Carbon Offsets Revisited: Shedding Light on Darkwoods
    van Kooten, Gerrit Cornelis
    Bogle, Timothy N.
    de Vries, Frans P.
    [J]. FOREST SCIENCE, 2015, 61 (02) : 370 - 380
  • [39] Carbon trading and carbon taxation: How to consider biotic sources and sinks
    Madlener, R
    Schlamadinger, B
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 1999, : 717 - 722
  • [40] Scenario Paths of Developing Forest Carbon Sinks for China to Achieve Carbon Neutrality
    Xu, Guangyue
    Schwarz, Peter
    Shi, Xiaojing
    Duma, Nathan
    [J]. LAND, 2023, 12 (07)