Volume strain within The Geysers geothermal field

被引:34
|
作者
Mossop, A [1 ]
Segall, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Geophys, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/1999JB900284
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
During the 1970s and 1980s, The Geysers geothermal region was rapidly developed as a site of geothermal power production. The likelihood that this could cause significant strain within the reservoir, with corresponding surface displacements, led to a Series of deformation monitoring surveys. In 1973, 1975, 1977, and 1980, The Geysers region was surveyed using first-order, class I, spirit leveling. In 1994, 1995, and 1996, many of the leveling control monuments were resurveyed using high-precision Global Positioning System receivers. The two survey methods are reconciled using the GEOID96 geoid model. The displacements are inverted to determine volume strain within the reservoir. For the period 1980-1994, peak volume strains in excess of 5 x 10(-4) are imaged. There is an excellent correlation between the observed changes in reservoir steam pressures and the imaged volume strain. If reservoir pressure changes are inducing volume strain, then the reservoir quasi-static bulk modulus K must be <4.6 x 10(9) Pa. However, seismic velocities indicate a much stiffer reservoir with K = 3.4 x 10(10) Pa. This apparent discrepancy is shown to be consistent with predicted frequency dependence in It for fractured and water-saturated reek. Inversion of surface deformation data therefore appears to be a powerful method for imaging pressure change within the body of the reservoir. Correlation between induced seismicity at The Geysers and volume strain is observed. However, earthquake distribution does not appear to have a simple relationship with volume strain rate.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:29113 / 29131
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] GEYSERS - GEOTHERMAL-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT
    WEINBERG, C
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 1978, 23 (01): : 41 - 41
  • [32] LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF RESERVOIR ROCK FROM THE GEYSERS GEOTHERMAL-FIELD, CALIFORNIA
    LOCKNER, DA
    SUMMERS, R
    MOORE, D
    BYERLEE, JD
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 1982, 19 (02): : 65 - 80
  • [33] Stress tensor changes related to fluid injection at The Geysers geothermal field, California
    Martinez-Garzon, Patricia
    Bohnhoff, Marco
    Kwiatek, Grzegorz
    Dresen, Georg
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 40 (11) : 2596 - 2601
  • [34] Temporal response of magnitude distribution to fluid injection rates in The Geysers geothermal field
    Leptokaropoulos, Konstantinos
    Staszek, Monika
    ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2019, 67 (01) : 327 - 339
  • [35] Sensitivity and stability analysis of coda quality factors at the geysers geothermal field, California
    Blanke A.
    Kwiatek G.
    Martínez-Garzón P.
    Bohnhoff M.
    Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2019, 109 (03): : 959 - 975
  • [36] Temporal response of magnitude distribution to fluid injection rates in The Geysers geothermal field
    Konstantinos Leptokaropoulos
    Monika Staszek
    Acta Geophysica, 2019, 67 : 327 - 339
  • [37] GEYSERS GEOTHERMAL POWER-PLANT
    FINNEY, JP
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 1972, 68 (07) : 83 - &
  • [38] Long Memory in Earthquake Time Series: The Case Study of the Geysers Geothermal Field
    Barani, S.
    Cristofaro, L.
    Taroni, M.
    Gil-Alana, L. A.
    Ferretti, G.
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [39] MICROEARTHQUAKES AT GEYSERS GEOTHERMAL AREA, CALIFORNIA
    HAMILTON, RM
    MUFFLER, LJP
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1972, 77 (11): : 2081 - +
  • [40] Machine learning reveals cyclic changes in seismic source spectra in Geysers geothermal field
    Holtzman, Benjamin K.
    Pate, Arthur
    Paisley, John
    Waldhauser, Felix
    Repetto, Douglas
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2018, 4 (05):