Volume strain within The Geysers geothermal field

被引:34
|
作者
Mossop, A [1 ]
Segall, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Geophys, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/1999JB900284
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
During the 1970s and 1980s, The Geysers geothermal region was rapidly developed as a site of geothermal power production. The likelihood that this could cause significant strain within the reservoir, with corresponding surface displacements, led to a Series of deformation monitoring surveys. In 1973, 1975, 1977, and 1980, The Geysers region was surveyed using first-order, class I, spirit leveling. In 1994, 1995, and 1996, many of the leveling control monuments were resurveyed using high-precision Global Positioning System receivers. The two survey methods are reconciled using the GEOID96 geoid model. The displacements are inverted to determine volume strain within the reservoir. For the period 1980-1994, peak volume strains in excess of 5 x 10(-4) are imaged. There is an excellent correlation between the observed changes in reservoir steam pressures and the imaged volume strain. If reservoir pressure changes are inducing volume strain, then the reservoir quasi-static bulk modulus K must be <4.6 x 10(9) Pa. However, seismic velocities indicate a much stiffer reservoir with K = 3.4 x 10(10) Pa. This apparent discrepancy is shown to be consistent with predicted frequency dependence in It for fractured and water-saturated reek. Inversion of surface deformation data therefore appears to be a powerful method for imaging pressure change within the body of the reservoir. Correlation between induced seismicity at The Geysers and volume strain is observed. However, earthquake distribution does not appear to have a simple relationship with volume strain rate.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:29113 / 29131
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GEYSERS GEOTHERMAL FIELD
    KILKENNY, J
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1977, 27 (NOV): : 6 - 6
  • [2] SEISMOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT THE GEYSERS GEOTHERMAL FIELD
    MAJER, EL
    MCEVILLY, TV
    GEOPHYSICS, 1979, 44 (02) : 246 - 269
  • [3] A DATABASE FOR THE GEYSERS GEOTHERMAL-FIELD
    RIPPERDA, M
    BODVARSSON, GS
    NEW HORIZONS, 1988, 12 : 481 - 484
  • [4] A RESERVOIR ASSESSMENT OF THE GEYSERS GEOTHERMAL-FIELD
    STOCKTON, AD
    THOMAS, RP
    CHAPMAN, RH
    DYKSTRA, H
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1984, 36 (13): : 2137 - 2159
  • [5] Analysis of curtailment at The Geysers geothermal Field, California
    Dobson, Patrick
    Dwivedi, Dipankar
    Millstein, Dev
    Krishnaswamy, Nandini
    Garcia, Julio
    Kiran, Mariam
    GEOTHERMICS, 2020, 87
  • [6] RESERVOIR ASSESSMENT OF THE GEYSERS GEOTHERMAL FIELD.
    Stockton, A.Douglas
    Thomas, Richard P.
    Chapman, Rodger H.
    Dykstra, Herman
    JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1984, 36 (13): : 2137 - 2159
  • [7] The impact of injection on seismicity at The Geysers, California Geothermal Field
    Majer, Ernest L.
    Peterson, John E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2007, 44 (08) : 1079 - 1090
  • [8] Geophysical characterization of the Northwest Geysers geothermal field, California
    Peacock, Jared R.
    Earney, Tait E.
    Mangan, Margaret T.
    Schermerhorn, William D.
    Glen, Jonathan M.
    Walters, Mark
    Hartline, Craig
    JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2020, 399 (399)
  • [9] Magnitude distribution complexity and variation at The Geysers geothermal field
    Leptokaropoulos, Konstantinos
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 222 (02) : 893 - 906
  • [10] Remotely triggered microearthquakes at The Geysers geothermal field, California
    Stark, MA
    Davis, SD
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1996, 23 (09) : 945 - 948