When and how sharing tourism experiences on social media backfires: TMSP model of sharing driven outcomes

被引:11
|
作者
Liu, Biqiang [1 ]
Moyle, Brent [1 ]
Kralj, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Dept Tourism Sport & Hotel Management, Parklands Dr, Gold Coast, Qld 4222, Australia
关键词
Social media sharing; Tourism experiences; Intention; Motivation; Psychological engagement; Self -presentation concerns; ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL; ENJOYMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.10.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Sharing tourism experiences on social media is a topical area in contemporary tourism research. However, existing studies tend to exclusively emphasise positive outcomes. This conceptual piece seeks to stimulate constructive discourse designed to reverse this misconception. Through the lens of Elaboration Likelihood Model and Impression Management Theory, we postulate the negative evaluation of tourism experiences may occur when intention to share interferes with the psychological engagement with an experience. Compounding this, negative evaluation can also potentially arise when sharing motivations are self-centred due to self-presentation concerns. This research proposes two theoretically informed caveats clarifying the underlying psychological mechanism which underpins how the negative evaluation is triggered. A conceptual model, termed TMSP model of sharing driven outcomes, is offered as a contribution designed to stimulate future empirical work on sharing tourism experiences on social media. To mitigate against the negative sharing driven outcomes, this research suggests theoretically and managerially relevant guidelines to produce desired outcomes and memorable experiences.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 159
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The study on the impact of short video tourism Vloggers at social media platform on online sharing intention
    Zhao, Chen
    Shen, Huawen
    Zhang, Yating
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [32] When Social Media Become Hostile Media: An Experimental Examination of News Sharing, Partisanship, and Follower Count
    Lee, Tae Kyoung
    Kim, Youngju
    Coe, Kevin
    [J]. MASS COMMUNICATION AND SOCIETY, 2018, 21 (04) : 450 - 472
  • [33] Social network perspective: Model of student's knowledge sharing on social network media
    Priyopradono, Bentar
    Manongga, Danny
    Utomo, Wiranto H.
    [J]. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 2012, 9 (3 3-2): : 54 - 58
  • [34] How does mobile social media affect knowledge sharing under the "Guanxi" system?
    Zhang, Xi
    Tang, Jiaxin
    Wei, Xin
    Yi, Minghui
    Ordonez, Patricia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 24 (06) : 1343 - 1367
  • [35] How do features of social media influence knowledge sharing? An ambient awareness perspective
    Zhao, Yuqing
    Zhang, Xi
    Wang, Jingyi
    Zhang, Kaihua
    Ordonez de Pablos, Patricia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 24 (02) : 439 - 462
  • [36] Sharing social media data: The role of past experiences, attitudes, norms, and perceived behavioral control
    Akdeniz, Esra
    Borschewski, Kerrin Emilia
    Breuer, Johannes
    Voronin, Yevhen
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BIG DATA, 2023, 5
  • [37] The Yale model of green message sharing and environmental consciousness on social media platforms
    Chang, Hsin Hsin
    Lu, Yu-Yu
    Li, Pei Ru
    [J]. ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2023, 47 (02) : 333 - 355
  • [38] Social Media Success for Academic Knowledge Sharing in Indonesia (Conceptual Model Development)
    Assegaff, Setiawan
    [J]. IAES INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATICS, 2017, 190
  • [39] Content Contribution for Revenue Sharing and Reputation in Social Media: A Dynamic Structural Model
    Tang, Qian
    Gu, Bin
    Whinston, Andrew B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2012, 29 (02) : 41 - 75
  • [40] Users' Psychological Perceptions of Information Sharing in the Context of Social Media: A Comprehensive Model
    Lin, Xiaolin
    Sarker, Saonee
    Featherman, Mauricio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2019, 23 (04) : 453 - 491