The 2019 European Elections: something old, something new, something borrowed, and something green

被引:1
|
作者
Franklin, Mark N.
Russo, Luana [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Trinity Coll Connecticut, Hartford, CT 06106 USA
[2] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Elections; Europe; European Union; populism; voting behaviour;
D O I
10.1017/ipo.2020.32
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In the aftermath of a European Parliament (EP) election, there are normally two prominent aspects that receive attention by scholars and experts: the turnout rate and whether the Second Order Election (SOE) model proposed by Reif and Schmitt (1980) still applies. That model is based on the idea that, because EP elections do not themselves provide enough stimulus as to replace the concerns normally present at national elections, the outcomes of EP elections in any participating country manifest themselves as a sort of distorted mirror of national (Parliamentary) elections in that country. The mirror is distorted because those national concerns are modified, not so much by the concerns arising from the European context in which EP elections are held as simply by the fact that EP elections are not national elections. In particular, at EP elections, national executive power is not at stake. The same party or parties will rule in each country after an EP election as ruled there before.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 313
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条