Transvesical Robotic Simple Prostatectomy: Initial Clinical Experience

被引:45
|
作者
Leslie, Scott [1 ]
Abreu, Andre Luis de Castro [1 ]
Chopra, Sameer [1 ]
Ramos, Patrick [1 ]
Park, Daniel [1 ]
Berger, Andre K. [1 ]
Desai, Mihir M. [1 ]
Gill, Inderbir S. [1 ]
Aron, Monish [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Inst Urol, Catherine & Joseph Aresty Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Simple prostatectomy; Robotic surgery; ASSISTED SIMPLE PROSTATECTOMY; BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; TRANSURETHRAL PHOTOSELECTIVE VAPORIZATION; HOLMIUM LASER ENUCLEATION; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; CONTEMPORARY SERIES; MORBIDITY; TRIAL; GRAMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.020
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Despite significant developments in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), simple prostatectomy remains an excellent option for patients with large glands. Objective: To describe our technique of transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy (RSP). Design, setting, and participants: From May 2011 to April 2013, 25 patients underwent RSP. Surgical procedure: We performed RSP using our technique. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Baseline demographics, pathology data, perioperative complications, 90-d complications, and functional outcomes were assessed. Results and limitations: Mean patient age was 72.9 yr (range: 54-88), baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was 23.9 (range: 9-35), prostate volume was 149.6 ml (range: 91-260), postvoid residual (PVR) was 208.1 ml (range: 72-800), maximum flow rate (Q(max)) was 11.3 ml/s, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen was 9.4 ng/ml (range: 1.9-56.3). Eight patients were catheter dependent before surgery. Mean operative time was 214 min (range: 165-345), estimated blood loss was 143 ml (range: 50-350), and the hospital stay was 4 d (range: 2-8). There were no intra-operative complications and no conversions to open surgery. Five patients had a concomitant robotic procedure performed. Early functional outcomes demonstrated significant improvement from baseline with an 85% reduction in mean IPSS (p < 0.0001), an 82.2% reduction in mean PVR (p = 0.014), and a 77% increase in mean Q(max) (p = 0.20). This study is limited by small sample size and short follow-up period. One patient had a urinary tract infection; two had recurrent hematuria, one requiring transfusion; one patient had clot retention and extravasation, requiring reoperation. Conclusions: Our technique of RSP is safe and effective. Good functional outcomes suggest it is a viable option for BPH and larger glands and can be used for patients requiring concomitant procedures. Patient summary: We describe the technique and report the initial results of a series of cases of transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy. The procedure is both feasible and safe and a good option for benign prostatic hyperplasia with larger glands. (C) 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 329
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laser robotic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: Development and initial clinical experience
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Gianduzzo, Troy
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Colombo, Jose Roberto Jr.
    Hafron, Jason
    Aron, Monish
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A265 - A265
  • [32] ROBOTIC TRANSVESICAL RECTOURETHRAL FISTULA REPAIR FOLLOWING A ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Linder, Brian
    Frank, Igor
    Dozois, Eric
    Elliott, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E164 - E165
  • [33] The Multi-Institutional Experience in Single-Port Robotic Transvesical Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Management EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Soda, Takeshi
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 208 (02): : 377 - 378
  • [34] Real-Time Robotic Transrectal Ultrasound Navigation During Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Initial Clinical Experience
    Long, Jean-Alexandre
    Lee, Byron H.
    Guillotreau, Julien
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Laydner, Humberto
    Yakoubi, Rachid
    Rizkala, Emad
    Stein, Robert J.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : 608 - 613
  • [35] SINGLE-PORT ROBOTIC TRANSVESICAL TOTAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Zuberek, Marcin
    Feldman-Schultz, Oren
    Crivellaro, Simone
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E452 - E452
  • [36] Initial Experience with Aspirin Use During Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
    Nowfar, Sepehr
    Kopp, Ryan
    Palazzi-Churas, Kerrin
    Derweesh, Ithaar H.
    Kane, Christopher J.
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 22 (03): : 225 - U
  • [37] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience of robotic surgery in Taiwan
    Wu, Sheng-Tang
    Tsui, Ke-Hung
    Tang, Shou-Hung
    Char, Dai-Lung
    Yu, Dah-Shyong
    Yen, Chung-Yran
    Chang, Sun-Yran
    Chen, Hong-I.
    Sun, Guang-Huan
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 28 (4A) : 1989 - 1992
  • [38] The Multi-Institutional Experience in Single-Port Robotic Transvesical Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Management. Reply.
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 208 (03):
  • [39] ROBOTIC SIMPLE PROSTATECTOMY
    Matei, D. V.
    Spinelli, M. G.
    Nordio, A.
    Brescia, A.
    Crisan, N.
    Coman, I.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (02) : 337 - 337
  • [40] Robotic simple prostatectomy
    Sotelo, Rene J.
    Carmona, Oswaldo
    Clavijo, Rafael
    Banda, Eduardo
    Miranda, Marcelo
    Palomino, Nelson
    Fagin, Randy
    Finelli, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 122 - 122