Transvesical Robotic Simple Prostatectomy: Initial Clinical Experience

被引:45
|
作者
Leslie, Scott [1 ]
Abreu, Andre Luis de Castro [1 ]
Chopra, Sameer [1 ]
Ramos, Patrick [1 ]
Park, Daniel [1 ]
Berger, Andre K. [1 ]
Desai, Mihir M. [1 ]
Gill, Inderbir S. [1 ]
Aron, Monish [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Inst Urol, Catherine & Joseph Aresty Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Simple prostatectomy; Robotic surgery; ASSISTED SIMPLE PROSTATECTOMY; BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; TRANSURETHRAL PHOTOSELECTIVE VAPORIZATION; HOLMIUM LASER ENUCLEATION; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; CONTEMPORARY SERIES; MORBIDITY; TRIAL; GRAMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.020
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Despite significant developments in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), simple prostatectomy remains an excellent option for patients with large glands. Objective: To describe our technique of transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy (RSP). Design, setting, and participants: From May 2011 to April 2013, 25 patients underwent RSP. Surgical procedure: We performed RSP using our technique. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Baseline demographics, pathology data, perioperative complications, 90-d complications, and functional outcomes were assessed. Results and limitations: Mean patient age was 72.9 yr (range: 54-88), baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was 23.9 (range: 9-35), prostate volume was 149.6 ml (range: 91-260), postvoid residual (PVR) was 208.1 ml (range: 72-800), maximum flow rate (Q(max)) was 11.3 ml/s, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen was 9.4 ng/ml (range: 1.9-56.3). Eight patients were catheter dependent before surgery. Mean operative time was 214 min (range: 165-345), estimated blood loss was 143 ml (range: 50-350), and the hospital stay was 4 d (range: 2-8). There were no intra-operative complications and no conversions to open surgery. Five patients had a concomitant robotic procedure performed. Early functional outcomes demonstrated significant improvement from baseline with an 85% reduction in mean IPSS (p < 0.0001), an 82.2% reduction in mean PVR (p = 0.014), and a 77% increase in mean Q(max) (p = 0.20). This study is limited by small sample size and short follow-up period. One patient had a urinary tract infection; two had recurrent hematuria, one requiring transfusion; one patient had clot retention and extravasation, requiring reoperation. Conclusions: Our technique of RSP is safe and effective. Good functional outcomes suggest it is a viable option for BPH and larger glands and can be used for patients requiring concomitant procedures. Patient summary: We describe the technique and report the initial results of a series of cases of transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy. The procedure is both feasible and safe and a good option for benign prostatic hyperplasia with larger glands. (C) 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 329
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ROBOTIC TRANSVESICAL SIMPLE PROSTATECTOMY - INITIAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE
    Kutuby, Fouad
    Abreu, Andre Luis De Castro
    Leslie, Scott
    Ahmadi, Hamed
    Berger, Andre K.
    Goh, Alvin C.
    Faber, Ken
    Park, Daniel
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Desai, Mihir M.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Aron, Monish
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A44 - A44
  • [2] ROBOTIC TRANSVESICAL SIMPLE PROSTATECTOMY: OUR EXPERIENCE AND TECHNIQUE
    Razdan, Shirin
    Ucpinar, Burak
    Okhawere, Kennedy E.
    Saini, Indu
    Tomy, Tara
    Badani, Ketan K.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E112 - E112
  • [3] Single-Port Percutaneous Transvesical Simple Prostatectomy Using the SP Robotic System: Initial Clinical Experience
    Kaouk, J.
    Sawczyn, G.
    Wilson, C.
    Aminsharifi, A.
    Fareed, K.
    Garisto, J.
    Lenfant, L.
    UROLOGY, 2020, 141 : 173 - 177
  • [4] Single Port Transvesical Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Initial Clinical Experience and Description of Technique
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Beksac, Alp Tuna
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Duncan, Alisa
    Schwen, Zeyad R.
    Eltemamy, Mohamed
    UROLOGY, 2021, 155 : 130 - 137
  • [5] ROBOTIC SIMPLE PROSTATECTOMY: TRANSVESICAL APPROACH
    Abreu, Andre Luis de Castro
    Leslie, Scott
    Goh, Alvin
    Berger, Andre K.
    Lewandowski, Pierre-Marie
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Desai, Mihir M.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Aron, Monish
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E417 - E417
  • [6] Single Port Transvesical Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Initial Clinical Experience and Description of Technique REPLY
    Rai, Arun
    Kavoussi, Louis
    UROLOGY, 2021, 155 : 137 - 137
  • [7] Robot-assisted transvesical simple prostatectomy: an initial experience in Taiwan
    Hu, Wei-Shiang
    Lin, Yi-Sheng
    Ou, Yen-Chuan
    Sheu, Jow-Yu
    Tung, Min-Che
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 : 92 - 92
  • [8] Robotic simple prostatectomy. Initial experience
    Sotelo, Rene
    Garcia, Alejandro
    Clavijo, Rafael
    Banda, Eduardo
    Miranda, Marcelo
    Carmona, Oswaldo
    Finelli, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A229 - A229
  • [9] Single Port Transvesical Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Initial Clinical Experience and Description of Technique EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Kaouk, Jihad
    UROLOGY, 2021, 155 : 137 - 137
  • [10] Single-Port Transvesical Simple Prostatectomy: Initial Clinical Report
    Desai, Mihir M.
    Aron, Monish
    Canes, David
    Fareed, Khaled
    Carmona, Oswaldo
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Crouzet, Sebastien
    Astigueta, Juan Carlos
    Lopez, Roy
    de Andrade, Robert
    Stein, Robert J.
    Ulchaker, James
    Sotelo, Rene
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    UROLOGY, 2008, 72 (05) : 960 - 965