A retrospective analysis of nadir-neutropenia directed pegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia rates in (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy regimens

被引:3
|
作者
Zardawi, Sarah J. [1 ]
Nordman, Ina [1 ]
Zdenkowski, Nicholas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Calvary Mater Newcastle, Dept Med Oncol, Edith St, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Heath, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[3] Breast Canc Trials, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
关键词
adjuvant chemotherapy; breast cancer; chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; neoadjuvant therapy; neutropenia; PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS; GROWTH-FACTORS; REAL-WORLD; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; TRASTUZUMAB; DOCETAXEL; DOXORUBICIN; PACLITAXEL; MORTALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/cnr2.1266
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Pegfilgrastim, a pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating-factor (GCSF), reduces chemotherapy morbidity and mortality in early stage breast cancer. The optimal approach to individual patient selection for GCSF is unknown, in particular whether secondary GCSF should be given after asymptomatic neutropenia, or only after febrile neutropenia (FN). Aims To determine if preplanned nadir blood counts and subsequent nadir-neutropenia directed GCSF was effective to reduce rates of FN associated with (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy. We also aimed to describe (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and GCSF prescribing practices at our institution. Methods This was a retrospective electronic medical record review. The rate of FN with secondary GCSF after cycle 1 nadir-neutropenia <1.0 x 10(9)cells/L was compared with the rate of FN in patients who did not have cycle 1 nadir blood counts or secondary GCSF, and analyzed according to patient and treatment data. Results Between 11/4/2011 and 22/4/2018, 584 patients received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Over all rates of FN were 17%, compared with 9% in patients who received primary GCSF. Rates of FN were highest in docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab (TCH, 27%) and docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC, 27%). There were 268 patients (46%) who received primary GCSF and 238 patients (41%) who received secondary GCSF. Rates of FN did not differ between patients who received nadir-neutropenia directed secondary GCSF (6/125, 5%, 95% CI 1.1-8.6), and those who did not have nadir blood counts or secondary GCSF (0/49, 0%, 95% CI not calculable) (P= .1186). GCSF use was associated with lower rates of non-FN hospital admissions. Patients >= 65 years were more likely to have FN and non-FN admissions. Two of three treatment related deaths occurred due to FN. Conclusions In this population, nadir-neutropenia directed secondary GCSF was not associated with reduced rates of FN. Observed rates of FN >20% in TC and TCH in routine clinical practice should guide primary GCSF use in accordance with international guidelines.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AN ANALYSIS OF GRANULOCYTE-COLONY STIMULATION FACTOR UTILIZATION FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA AMONG BREAST CANCER PATIENTS IN THE UNITED STATES
    Lee, C. H.
    Mccombs, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S58 - S58
  • [22] Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia
    Yalcin, S
    Guler, N
    Kansu, E
    Ertenli, I
    Gullu, I
    Kars, A
    Akpek, G
    Barista, I
    Tekuzman, G
    Baltali, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A : 591 - 591
  • [23] Commentary - A comprehensive safety understanding of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor biosimilars and Intended Copy Biologics in treating chemotherapy associated febrile neutropenia
    Cornes, P. G.
    Muenzberg, M.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 406
  • [24] Effects of primary granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prophylaxis on the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with germ cell tumors
    Hapakova, Nikola
    Chovanec, Michal
    Rejlekova, Katarina
    Kalavska, Katarina
    Obertova, Jana
    Palacka, Patrik
    De Angelis, Valentina
    Svetlovska, Daniela
    Sycova-Mila, Zuzana
    Mardiak, Jozef
    Mego, Michal
    [J]. ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2022, 24 (03)
  • [25] Side effects of using granulocyte-colony stimulating factors as prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients: A systematic review
    Lapidari, Pietro
    Vaz-Luis, Ines
    Di Meglio, Antonio
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2021, 157
  • [26] Cost-Effectiveness of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia in Breast Cancer in the United Kingdom
    Whyte, Sophie
    Cooper, Katy L.
    Stevenson, Matt D.
    Madan, Jason
    Akehurst, Ron
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 465 - 474
  • [27] Granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor adjuvant treatment in febrile neutropenia associated to induction therapy in acute leukemias
    Cucuianu, A
    Petrov, L
    Bojan, A
    Vasilache, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1998, 102 (01) : 88 - 88
  • [28] Towards a comprehensive safety understanding of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor biosimilars in treating chemotherapy associated febrile neutropenia: Trends from decades of data
    Rastogi, Shruti
    Shukla, Shatrunajay
    Sharma, Arvind Kumar
    Sarwat, Maryam
    Srivastava, Pranay
    Katiyar, Tridiv
    Kalaiselvan, Vivekanandan
    Singh, Gyanendra Nath
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 395
  • [29] Appropriateness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients receiving chemotherapy by febrile neutropenia risk level
    Baig, Hassam
    Somlo, Barbara
    Eisen, Melissa
    Stryker, Scott
    Bensink, Mark
    Morrow, Phuong K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (07) : 1576 - 1585
  • [30] EFFECT OF GRANULOCYTE-COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR ON CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED NEUTROPENIA IN CHILDREN WITH CANCER
    KALMANTI, M
    LYDAKI, E
    DIMITRIOU, H
    KALMANTIS, T
    VLACHONICOLIS, I
    KAMBOURAKIS, A
    ZIOGA, I
    BOLONAKI, I
    [J]. PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 1994, 11 (02) : 147 - 155