A retrospective analysis of nadir-neutropenia directed pegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia rates in (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy regimens

被引:3
|
作者
Zardawi, Sarah J. [1 ]
Nordman, Ina [1 ]
Zdenkowski, Nicholas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Calvary Mater Newcastle, Dept Med Oncol, Edith St, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Heath, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[3] Breast Canc Trials, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
关键词
adjuvant chemotherapy; breast cancer; chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; neoadjuvant therapy; neutropenia; PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS; GROWTH-FACTORS; REAL-WORLD; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; TRASTUZUMAB; DOCETAXEL; DOXORUBICIN; PACLITAXEL; MORTALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/cnr2.1266
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Pegfilgrastim, a pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating-factor (GCSF), reduces chemotherapy morbidity and mortality in early stage breast cancer. The optimal approach to individual patient selection for GCSF is unknown, in particular whether secondary GCSF should be given after asymptomatic neutropenia, or only after febrile neutropenia (FN). Aims To determine if preplanned nadir blood counts and subsequent nadir-neutropenia directed GCSF was effective to reduce rates of FN associated with (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy. We also aimed to describe (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and GCSF prescribing practices at our institution. Methods This was a retrospective electronic medical record review. The rate of FN with secondary GCSF after cycle 1 nadir-neutropenia <1.0 x 10(9)cells/L was compared with the rate of FN in patients who did not have cycle 1 nadir blood counts or secondary GCSF, and analyzed according to patient and treatment data. Results Between 11/4/2011 and 22/4/2018, 584 patients received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Over all rates of FN were 17%, compared with 9% in patients who received primary GCSF. Rates of FN were highest in docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab (TCH, 27%) and docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC, 27%). There were 268 patients (46%) who received primary GCSF and 238 patients (41%) who received secondary GCSF. Rates of FN did not differ between patients who received nadir-neutropenia directed secondary GCSF (6/125, 5%, 95% CI 1.1-8.6), and those who did not have nadir blood counts or secondary GCSF (0/49, 0%, 95% CI not calculable) (P= .1186). GCSF use was associated with lower rates of non-FN hospital admissions. Patients >= 65 years were more likely to have FN and non-FN admissions. Two of three treatment related deaths occurred due to FN. Conclusions In this population, nadir-neutropenia directed secondary GCSF was not associated with reduced rates of FN. Observed rates of FN >20% in TC and TCH in routine clinical practice should guide primary GCSF use in accordance with international guidelines.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A retrospective analysis of nadir-neutropenia directed pegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) on febrile neutropenia (FN) rates in (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy regimens
    Zardawi, Sarah
    Zdenkowski, Nicholas
    Nordman, Ina
    Mallesara, Girish
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 15 : 190 - 191
  • [2] Prophylaxis of Febrile Neutropenia with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor
    Takamatsu, Yasushi
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 : 59 - 59
  • [3] Is febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors economically justified for adjuvant TC chemotherapy in breast cancer?
    Chris Skedgel
    Daniel Rayson
    Tallal Younis
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016, 24 : 387 - 394
  • [4] Is febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors economically justified for adjuvant TC chemotherapy in breast cancer?
    Skedgel, Chris
    Rayson, Daniel
    Younis, Tallal
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2016, 24 (01) : 387 - 394
  • [5] A randomized trial of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to prevent febrile neutropenia in breast cancer after chemotherapy.
    Zhang, Lina
    Li, Yuntao
    Fan, Zhonglin
    Wang, Meiqi
    Hui, Tianli
    Zhang, Yanshou
    Gao, Chunhui
    Zhang, Jing
    Zhang, Guoshuan
    Kong, Xiangshun
    Geng, Cuizhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16)
  • [6] Impact of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on docetaxel-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer
    Zekri, Jamal
    Nawaz, Azhar
    Rasool, Haleem
    Ahmad, Imran
    Abdel Rahman, Hossam
    Dada, Reyad
    Abdelghany, Ehab Mosaad
    Farag, Kamel
    Ibrahim, Refaei Belal
    Deibas, Mohamed Youssef
    Kamel, Mohamed Kamal
    Allithy, Ahmed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (08) : 1681 - 1686
  • [7] Real-world impact of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia
    Altwairgi, A. K.
    Hopman, W. M.
    Mates, M.
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (03) : E171 - E179
  • [8] Incidence of febrile neutropenia in docetaxel chemotherapy without prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) for metastatic prostate cancer
    Renninson, Emily
    Closier, Philippa
    Jonnada, Sai
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 30 : E1 - E1
  • [9] Incidence of febrile neutropenia in docetaxel chemotherapy without prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) for metastatic prostate cancer
    Renninson, Emily
    Closier, Philippa
    Jonnada, Sai
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 30 : E4 - E4
  • [10] Febrile neutropenia and role of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for breast cancer
    Kimura, Yuri
    Sasada, Shinsuke
    Emi, Akiko
    Masumoto, Norio
    Kadoya, Takayuki
    Okada, Morihito
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (07) : 3507 - 3512