Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal neoplasia is easily learned, efficacious, and safe

被引:49
|
作者
Wang, Andrew Y. [1 ]
Flynn, Mary M. [1 ]
Patrie, James T. [2 ]
Cox, Dawn G. [1 ]
Bleibel, Wissam [1 ]
Mann, James A. [1 ]
Sauer, Bryan G. [1 ]
Shami, Vanessa M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[2] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Div Biostat & Epidemiol, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
关键词
Underwater EMR; Colorectal polyp; Endoscopic ultrasound; Efficacy; Safety; SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; RECURRENCE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-013-3297-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) without submucosal injection is a novel endoscopic procedure. It is not known if UEMR can be easily taught and learned, and the efficacy and safety of UEMR has not been demonstrated at multiple medical centers. Our aims were to demonstrate that (1) UEMR is a technique that can be easily learned by an endoscopist trained in traditional EMR, (2) endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) may not be required before UEMR, and (3) UEMR is an efficacious and safe method for resection of large or flat neoplastic colorectal lesions. An experienced interventional endoscopist began performing UEMR after observing UEMR procedures. Colorectal UEMR was performed using a pediatric colonoscope with a cap, a waterjet, and a 'duck-bill' snare using blended current. Submucosal injection was not used. Patient data were collected prospectively. A total of 21 patients (17 men, mean age 64.9 years, range 51-83) referred for polypectomy of large colorectal lesions underwent UEMR. A total of 43 colorectal lesions with a mean size of 20 mm (range 8-50) were resected by UEMR. Lesions were found in the right colon (N = 16), transverse colon (N = 5), left colon (N = 19), and rectum (N = 3). Pathology demonstrated tubular adenoma (N = 29), tubulovillous adenoma (N = 5), high-grade dysplasia (N = 3), serrated sessile adenoma without dysplasia (N = 3), and non-neoplastic tissue (N = 3). EUS was used in only two cases of rectal neoplasia (4.7 %). Of the UEMRs, 97.7 % were successful with complete resection of colorectal polyps. The only adverse event was one case (2.3 %) of delayed post-UEMR bleeding. UEMR was easily learned by an endoscopist already skilled in conventional EMR. EUS may not be required prior to most UEMR procedures. UEMR appears to be an efficacious and safe alternative to traditional EMR or ESD for large or flat colorectal neoplasms.
引用
收藏
页码:1348 / 1354
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFICACY OF UNDERWATER VERSUS CONVENTIONAL ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION OF LARGE COLORECTAL POLYPS
    Fiedler, Alexandra
    Dhindsa, Banreet
    Samson, Kaeli
    Barbaretta, Jason
    Scholten, Kyle
    Brittan, Kevin
    Bhat, Ishfaq
    Singh, Shailender
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 99 (06) : AB524 - AB525
  • [32] Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection: an alternative treatment for large colorectal polyp removal
    Sandhu, Dalbir S.
    Lee, Ye J.
    Gerke, Henning
    [J]. MINERVA GASTROENTEROLOGICA E DIETOLOGICA, 2018, 64 (02) : 106 - 110
  • [33] Curative value of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for submucosally invasive colorectal cancer
    Fukuda, Hiromu
    Takeuchi, Yoji
    Shoji, Ayaka
    Miyake, Muneaki
    Matsueda, Katsunori
    Inoue, Takahiro
    Waki, Kotaro
    Shimamoto, Yusaku
    Kono, Mitsuhiro
    Iwagami, Hiroyoshi
    Nakahira, Hiroko
    Matsuura, Noriko
    Shichijo, Satoki
    Maekawa, Akira
    Kanesaka, Takashi
    Yamamoto, Sachiko
    Higashino, Koji
    Uedo, Noriya
    Ishihara, Ryu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 (09) : 2471 - 2478
  • [34] Feasibility and outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥ 10 mm colorectal polyps
    Keith Siau
    Sauid Ishaq
    Sergio Cadoni
    Toshio Kuwai
    Abdulkani Yusuf
    Noriko Suzuki
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 2656 - 2663
  • [35] Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps
    Robert J. Schenck
    Darius A. Jahann
    James T. Patrie
    Edward B. Stelow
    Dawn G. Cox
    Dushant S. Uppal
    Bryan G. Sauer
    Vanessa M. Shami
    Daniel S. Strand
    Andrew Y. Wang
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 4174 - 4183
  • [36] Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Is Associated With Fewer Recurrences and Earlier Curative Resections Compared to Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Large Colorectal Polyps
    Schenck, Robert J.
    Jahann, Darius A.
    Patrie, James T.
    Sauer, Bryan G.
    Shami, Vanessa M.
    Strand, Daniel S.
    Wang, Andrew Y.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 : S569 - S570
  • [37] Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps
    Schenck, Robert J.
    Jahann, Darius A.
    Patrie, James T.
    Stelow, Edward B.
    Cox, Dawn G.
    Uppal, Dushant S.
    Sauer, Bryan G.
    Shami, Vanessa M.
    Strand, Daniel S.
    Wang, Andrew Y.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (10): : 4174 - 4183
  • [38] Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for anal canal neoplasia in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection
    Hirai, Mami
    Yamasaki, Yasushi
    Harada, Keita
    Okada, Hiroyuki
    [J]. ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 31 (04): : 521 - 521
  • [39] Endoscopic mucosal resection: an evolving therapeutic strategy for non-polypoid colorectal neoplasia
    Kiesslich, R
    Neurath, MF
    [J]. GUT, 2004, 53 (09) : 1222 - 1224
  • [40] FULL-THICKNESS ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION FOR DEEPLY INVASIVE SUBMUCOSAL COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA
    Schoeman, Scott
    Shahidi, Neal C.
    van Hattem, Arnout
    Sidhu, Mayenaaz
    Bourke, Michael J.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (06) : AB95 - AB95