Online continuing medical education (CME) for GPs: does it work? A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Thepwongsa, Isaraporn [1 ]
Kirby, Catherine [2 ]
Schattner, Peter [1 ]
Piterman, Leon [3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Primary Hlth Care, Notting Hill, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Off Pro Vice Chancellor, Berwick, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Berwick, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
education; medical; continuing; internet; general practice; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; INTERNET-BASED CME; HEALTH-PROFESSIONS; EVALUATION OUTCOMES; SATISFACTION; PHYSICIANS; KNOWLEDGE; PARTICIPANTS; METAANALYSIS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Numerous studies have assessed the effectiveness of online continuing medical education (CME) designed to improve healthcare professionals' care of patients. The effects of online educational interventions targeted at general practitioners (GP), however, have not been systematically reviewed. Methods A computer search was conducted through seven databases for studies assessing changes in GPs' knowledge and practice, or patient outcomes following an online educational intervention. Results Eleven studies met the eligibility criteria. Most studies (8/11, 72.7%) found a significant improvement in at least one of the following outcomes: satisfaction, knowledge or practice change. There was little evidence for the impact of online CME on patient outcomes. Variability in study design, characteristics of online and outcome measures limited conclusions on the effects of online CME. Discussion Online CME could improve GP satisfaction, knowledge and practices but there are very few well-designed studies that focus on this delivery method of GP education.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 56
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条